Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?

OBJECTIVE: To explore the stability of conclusions from mental health services research across differing care systems. Contradictory results in different countries for similar studies of programmes for patients with schizophrenia have usually been attributed to poor replication. This paper explores...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burns, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2000
_version_ 1826269465527975936
author Burns, T
author_facet Burns, T
author_sort Burns, T
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the stability of conclusions from mental health services research across differing care systems. Contradictory results in different countries for similar studies of programmes for patients with schizophrenia have usually been attributed to poor replication. This paper explores whether these differing results can illuminate aspects of schizophrenia by examining the interaction of the disorder with the care context as an alternative explanation. METHOD: The findings of a large UK random controlled trial of intensive case management with such patients is compared to previous UK and US studies. RESULTS: Reduction of case-load size of psychotic patients did not significantly reduce their need for hospitalization in the context of locally available co-ordinated care. CONCLUSION: There is more to be gained in understanding complex disorders such as schizophrenia by interpreting the impact of context on treatment study outcomes than by simply dismissing contradictory findings as failures of implementation of either research or clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:25:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:42f5de35-e99f-41a9-a895-9b5e9c142a18
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:25:28Z
publishDate 2000
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:42f5de35-e99f-41a9-a895-9b5e9c142a182022-03-26T14:52:33ZModels of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:42f5de35-e99f-41a9-a895-9b5e9c142a18EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2000Burns, TOBJECTIVE: To explore the stability of conclusions from mental health services research across differing care systems. Contradictory results in different countries for similar studies of programmes for patients with schizophrenia have usually been attributed to poor replication. This paper explores whether these differing results can illuminate aspects of schizophrenia by examining the interaction of the disorder with the care context as an alternative explanation. METHOD: The findings of a large UK random controlled trial of intensive case management with such patients is compared to previous UK and US studies. RESULTS: Reduction of case-load size of psychotic patients did not significantly reduce their need for hospitalization in the context of locally available co-ordinated care. CONCLUSION: There is more to be gained in understanding complex disorders such as schizophrenia by interpreting the impact of context on treatment study outcomes than by simply dismissing contradictory findings as failures of implementation of either research or clinical practice.
spellingShingle Burns, T
Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title_full Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title_fullStr Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title_full_unstemmed Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title_short Models of community treatments in schizophrenia: do they travel?
title_sort models of community treatments in schizophrenia do they travel
work_keys_str_mv AT burnst modelsofcommunitytreatmentsinschizophreniadotheytravel