Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory
<p>We argue that moral decision making is reasons-based, focusing on the idea that people encounter decisions as questions to be answered and that they process reasons to the extent that they can see them as putative answers to those questions. After introducing our topic, we sketch the erote...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book section |
| Published: |
Routledge
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826269469150806016 |
|---|---|
| author | Koralus, P Alfano, M |
| author2 | Bonnefon, J |
| author_facet | Bonnefon, J Koralus, P Alfano, M |
| author_sort | Koralus, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>We argue that moral decision making is reasons-based, focusing on the idea that people encounter decisions as questions to be answered and that they process reasons to the extent that they can see them as putative answers to those questions. After introducing our topic, we sketch the erotetic reasons-based framework for decision making. We then describe three experiments that extend this framework to moral decision making in different question frames, cast doubt on theories of moral decision making that discount reasons and appeal, and replicate our initial finds in moral contexts that do not involve direct physical harm. We conclude by reinterpreting Stanley Milgram’s studies in destructive obedience in our new framework.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:25:32Z |
| format | Book section |
| id | oxford-uuid:42f82ae9-1220-4b9c-bade-33a7c21ba56d |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:25:32Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:42f82ae9-1220-4b9c-bade-33a7c21ba56d2022-03-26T14:52:29ZReasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theoryBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248uuid:42f82ae9-1220-4b9c-bade-33a7c21ba56dSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2017Koralus, PAlfano, MBonnefon, JTrémolière, B <p>We argue that moral decision making is reasons-based, focusing on the idea that people encounter decisions as questions to be answered and that they process reasons to the extent that they can see them as putative answers to those questions. After introducing our topic, we sketch the erotetic reasons-based framework for decision making. We then describe three experiments that extend this framework to moral decision making in different question frames, cast doubt on theories of moral decision making that discount reasons and appeal, and replicate our initial finds in moral contexts that do not involve direct physical harm. We conclude by reinterpreting Stanley Milgram’s studies in destructive obedience in our new framework.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Koralus, P Alfano, M Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title | Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title_full | Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title_fullStr | Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title_short | Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| title_sort | reasons based moral judgment and the erotetic theory |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT koralusp reasonsbasedmoraljudgmentandtheerotetictheory AT alfanom reasonsbasedmoraljudgmentandtheerotetictheory |