Making constitutional principles into law
Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and why, as it did not prevent Parliament performing its constitutional role, Parliament did not simply reverse it. Discusses how the claimants argued that classic cases supported their position, an...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sweet and Maxwell
2020
|
| _version_ | 1797110613995945984 |
|---|---|
| author | Endicott, T |
| author_facet | Endicott, T |
| author_sort | Endicott, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and why, as it did not prevent Parliament performing its constitutional role, Parliament did not simply reverse it. Discusses how the claimants argued that classic cases supported their position, and argues that the court assumed a share of Parliament's previously undiluted responsibility for deciding whether, and how, it can replace the Government. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:57:17Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:43743877-b247-4c62-ae12-2611e635f84a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:57:17Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Sweet and Maxwell |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:43743877-b247-4c62-ae12-2611e635f84a2023-09-01T16:03:02ZMaking constitutional principles into lawJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:43743877-b247-4c62-ae12-2611e635f84aEnglishSymplectic ElementsSweet and Maxwell2020Endicott, TExamines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and why, as it did not prevent Parliament performing its constitutional role, Parliament did not simply reverse it. Discusses how the claimants argued that classic cases supported their position, and argues that the court assumed a share of Parliament's previously undiluted responsibility for deciding whether, and how, it can replace the Government. |
| spellingShingle | Endicott, T Making constitutional principles into law |
| title | Making constitutional principles into law |
| title_full | Making constitutional principles into law |
| title_fullStr | Making constitutional principles into law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Making constitutional principles into law |
| title_short | Making constitutional principles into law |
| title_sort | making constitutional principles into law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT endicottt makingconstitutionalprinciplesintolaw |