Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers

Complexity theorists routinely compare—via the pre-ordering induced by asymptotic notation—the efficiency of computers so as to ascertain which offers the most efficient solution to a given problem. Tacit in this statement, however, is that the computers conform to a standard computational model: th...

Cijeli opis

Bibliografski detalji
Glavni autor: Blakey, E
Format: Journal article
Jezik:English
Izdano: North Atlantic University Union (NAUN) 2010
Teme:
_version_ 1826269687790436352
author Blakey, E
author_facet Blakey, E
author_sort Blakey, E
collection OXFORD
description Complexity theorists routinely compare—via the pre-ordering induced by asymptotic notation—the efficiency of computers so as to ascertain which offers the most efficient solution to a given problem. Tacit in this statement, however, is that the computers conform to a standard computational model: that is, they are Turing machines, random-access machines or similar. However, whereas meaningful comparison between these conventional computers is well understood and correctly practised, that of non-standard machines (such as quantum, chemical and optical computers) is rarely even attempted and, where it is, is often attempted under the typically false assumption that the conventional-computing approach to comparison is adequate in the unconventional-computing case. We discuss in the present paper a computational-model-independent approach to the comparison of computers' complexity (and define the corresponding complexity classes). Notably, the approach allows meaningful comparison between an unconventional computer and an existing, digital-computer benchmark that solves the same problem.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:29:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:440697b7-5b35-4504-b76a-092a729cd572
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:29:00Z
publishDate 2010
publisher North Atlantic University Union (NAUN)
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:440697b7-5b35-4504-b76a-092a729cd5722022-03-26T14:59:10ZApples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computersJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:440697b7-5b35-4504-b76a-092a729cd572Computer science (mathematics)EnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetNorth Atlantic University Union (NAUN)2010Blakey, EComplexity theorists routinely compare—via the pre-ordering induced by asymptotic notation—the efficiency of computers so as to ascertain which offers the most efficient solution to a given problem. Tacit in this statement, however, is that the computers conform to a standard computational model: that is, they are Turing machines, random-access machines or similar. However, whereas meaningful comparison between these conventional computers is well understood and correctly practised, that of non-standard machines (such as quantum, chemical and optical computers) is rarely even attempted and, where it is, is often attempted under the typically false assumption that the conventional-computing approach to comparison is adequate in the unconventional-computing case. We discuss in the present paper a computational-model-independent approach to the comparison of computers' complexity (and define the corresponding complexity classes). Notably, the approach allows meaningful comparison between an unconventional computer and an existing, digital-computer benchmark that solves the same problem.
spellingShingle Computer science (mathematics)
Blakey, E
Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title_full Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title_fullStr Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title_full_unstemmed Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title_short Apples & oranges? Comparing unconventional computers
title_sort apples amp oranges comparing unconventional computers
topic Computer science (mathematics)
work_keys_str_mv AT blakeye applesamporangescomparingunconventionalcomputers