Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis is subject to several uncertainties, especially in primary care. The aims of this study were to determine (i) the diagnostic accuracy of coding of hip osteoarthritis by primary care physicians in the UK Clinical Pract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferguson, R, Prieto-Alhambra, D, Walker, C, Yu, D, Valderas, J, Judge, A, Griffiths, J, Jordan, K, Peat, G, Glyn-Jones, S, Silman, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2018
_version_ 1826269817515016192
author Ferguson, R
Prieto-Alhambra, D
Walker, C
Yu, D
Valderas, J
Judge, A
Griffiths, J
Jordan, K
Peat, G
Glyn-Jones, S
Silman, A
author_facet Ferguson, R
Prieto-Alhambra, D
Walker, C
Yu, D
Valderas, J
Judge, A
Griffiths, J
Jordan, K
Peat, G
Glyn-Jones, S
Silman, A
author_sort Ferguson, R
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis is subject to several uncertainties, especially in primary care. The aims of this study were to determine (i) the diagnostic accuracy of coding of hip osteoarthritis by primary care physicians in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), (ii) the relative influence of radiographic and clinical parameters on diagnostic accuracy, and (iii) the accuracy of the diagnosis date.</p><p> <strong>Methods:</strong> An extract of all patients aged over 65 years, with a Read code for hip osteoarthritis listed between January 1995 and December 2014, was obtained from CPRD. A random sample was selected of 170 participants. A questionnaire concerning data in medical records on relevant clinical and radiographic criteria used to establish the diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis was distributed to primary care physicians of participants. Using diagnostic criteria, we formulated thresholds for diagnosis based on clinical, radiographic and combined grounds. </p><p> <strong>Results:</strong> 119 completed questionnaires were returned (70% response rate). The positive predictive value (PPV) of hip osteoarthritis codes, based on radiological criteria, was 79.8%. The PPV, based on clinical criteria, was 79.0%, with substantial but not complete overlap. Overall 12% of diagnoses were not confirmed. In 42% of cases, there was disparity between date of diagnosis in CPRD and the medical record. Median difference in date was +/-425 days (interquartile range, 18-1448 days). </p><p> <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Despite the difficulties in reaching a diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis in primary care, CPRD Read codes have a sufficiently high PPV for most research uses. However, the accuracy of diagnosis date may not be as reliable.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:31:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:44b392d8-683b-4e50-aac2-fdacd0a613a0
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:31:05Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:44b392d8-683b-4e50-aac2-fdacd0a613a02022-03-26T15:03:17ZValidation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research DatalinkJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:44b392d8-683b-4e50-aac2-fdacd0a613a0Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2018Ferguson, RPrieto-Alhambra, DWalker, CYu, DValderas, JJudge, AGriffiths, JJordan, KPeat, GGlyn-Jones, SSilman, A<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis is subject to several uncertainties, especially in primary care. The aims of this study were to determine (i) the diagnostic accuracy of coding of hip osteoarthritis by primary care physicians in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), (ii) the relative influence of radiographic and clinical parameters on diagnostic accuracy, and (iii) the accuracy of the diagnosis date.</p><p> <strong>Methods:</strong> An extract of all patients aged over 65 years, with a Read code for hip osteoarthritis listed between January 1995 and December 2014, was obtained from CPRD. A random sample was selected of 170 participants. A questionnaire concerning data in medical records on relevant clinical and radiographic criteria used to establish the diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis was distributed to primary care physicians of participants. Using diagnostic criteria, we formulated thresholds for diagnosis based on clinical, radiographic and combined grounds. </p><p> <strong>Results:</strong> 119 completed questionnaires were returned (70% response rate). The positive predictive value (PPV) of hip osteoarthritis codes, based on radiological criteria, was 79.8%. The PPV, based on clinical criteria, was 79.0%, with substantial but not complete overlap. Overall 12% of diagnoses were not confirmed. In 42% of cases, there was disparity between date of diagnosis in CPRD and the medical record. Median difference in date was +/-425 days (interquartile range, 18-1448 days). </p><p> <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Despite the difficulties in reaching a diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis in primary care, CPRD Read codes have a sufficiently high PPV for most research uses. However, the accuracy of diagnosis date may not be as reliable.</p>
spellingShingle Ferguson, R
Prieto-Alhambra, D
Walker, C
Yu, D
Valderas, J
Judge, A
Griffiths, J
Jordan, K
Peat, G
Glyn-Jones, S
Silman, A
Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_fullStr Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full_unstemmed Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_short Validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_sort validation of hip osteoarthritis diagnosis recording in the uk clinical practice research datalink
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonr validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT prietoalhambrad validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT walkerc validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT yud validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT valderasj validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT judgea validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT griffithsj validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT jordank validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT peatg validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT glynjoness validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT silmana validationofhiposteoarthritisdiagnosisrecordingintheukclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink