Midsession reversal task with pigeons: Parallel processing of alternatives explains choices
Most models of choice assume a “tug of war” (ToW) between options present at the time of the choice, arguing that preferences are built in this process, and implying that adding options increases delay to act. In contrast, the Sequential Choice Model (SCM) proposes that choices are driven by paralle...
Auteurs principaux: | Smith, A, Zentall, T, Kacelnik, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Publié: |
American Psychological Association
2018
|
Documents similaires
-
The ephemeral reward task: Pigeons and rats fail to learn unless discouraged from impulsive choice
par: Thomas R. Zentall, et autres
Publié: (2018-02-01) -
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
par: Aaron P Smith, et autres
Publié: (2016-01-01) -
Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
par: Aaron P. Smith, et autres
Publié: (2017-07-01) -
The problem with two-event sequence learning by pigeons
par: Thomas R. Zentall, et autres
Publié: (2024-10-01) -
Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.
par: Vasconcelos, M, et autres
Publié: (2010)