Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies
The interconnectedness of two linguistic registers, the ‘vernacular’ and the ‘morethan- local’ or ‘pan-Hellenic’, is a well-known characteristic of the Kunstsprache of Greek lyric. The two case-studies considered in this paper, Pindar’s Olympian 1 and a roughly contemporary Boeotian stone-epigram of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Conference item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Fondation Hardt
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797065953559707648 |
|---|---|
| author | Prauscello, L |
| author2 | Willi, A |
| author_facet | Willi, A Prauscello, L |
| author_sort | Prauscello, L |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The interconnectedness of two linguistic registers, the ‘vernacular’ and the ‘morethan- local’ or ‘pan-Hellenic’, is a well-known characteristic of the Kunstsprache of Greek lyric. The two case-studies considered in this paper, Pindar’s Olympian 1 and a roughly contemporary Boeotian stone-epigram of ‘local’ production (CEG 114) exemplify opposite poles within the spectrum of linguistic possibilities available to Greek archaic and classical poets and their audiences. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:35:36Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:46260660-4826-4ad0-8a02-1fdf4262eba5 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:35:36Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Fondation Hardt |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:46260660-4826-4ad0-8a02-1fdf4262eba52022-03-26T15:12:00ZGreek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studiesConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:46260660-4826-4ad0-8a02-1fdf4262eba5EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordFondation Hardt2019Prauscello, LWilli, AThe interconnectedness of two linguistic registers, the ‘vernacular’ and the ‘morethan- local’ or ‘pan-Hellenic’, is a well-known characteristic of the Kunstsprache of Greek lyric. The two case-studies considered in this paper, Pindar’s Olympian 1 and a roughly contemporary Boeotian stone-epigram of ‘local’ production (CEG 114) exemplify opposite poles within the spectrum of linguistic possibilities available to Greek archaic and classical poets and their audiences. |
| spellingShingle | Prauscello, L Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title | Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title_full | Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title_fullStr | Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title_short | Greek lyric Kunstsprache between pan-Hellenism and epichoric influence: two case-studies |
| title_sort | greek lyric kunstsprache between pan hellenism and epichoric influence two case studies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT prauscellol greeklyrickunstsprachebetweenpanhellenismandepichoricinfluencetwocasestudies |