Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions

The ability of the climate models submitted to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) database to simulate the Northern Hemisphere winter climate following a large tropical volcanic eruption is assessed. When sulfate aerosols are produced by volcanic injections into the tropical stratos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Driscoll, S, Bozzo, A, Gray, L, Robock, A, Stenchikov, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1826270187956994048
author Driscoll, S
Bozzo, A
Gray, L
Robock, A
Stenchikov, G
author_facet Driscoll, S
Bozzo, A
Gray, L
Robock, A
Stenchikov, G
author_sort Driscoll, S
collection OXFORD
description The ability of the climate models submitted to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) database to simulate the Northern Hemisphere winter climate following a large tropical volcanic eruption is assessed. When sulfate aerosols are produced by volcanic injections into the tropical stratosphere and spread by the stratospheric circulation, it not only causes globally averaged tropospheric cooling but also a localized heating in the lower stratosphere, which can cause major dynamical feedbacks. Observations show a lower stratospheric and surface response during the following one or two Northern Hemisphere (NH) winters, that resembles the positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Simulations from 13 CMIP5 models that represent tropical eruptions in the 19th and 20th century are examined, focusing on the large-scale regional impacts associated with the large-scale circulation during the NH winter season. The models generally fail to capture the NH dynamical response following eruptions. They do not sufficiently simulate the observed post-volcanic strengthened NH polar vortex, positive NAO, or NH Eurasian warming pattern, and they tend to overestimate the cooling in the tropical troposphere. The findings are confirmed by a superposed epoch analysis of the NAO index for each model. The study confirms previous similar evaluations and raises concern for the ability of current climate models to simulate the response of a major mode of global circulation variability to external forcings. This is also of concern for the accuracy of geoengineering modeling studies that assess the atmospheric response to stratosphere-injected particles. © 2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:36:55Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:46934bf8-406d-43dd-8ef5-cdb47a0c130b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:36:55Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:46934bf8-406d-43dd-8ef5-cdb47a0c130b2022-03-26T15:14:28ZCoupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:46934bf8-406d-43dd-8ef5-cdb47a0c130bEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Driscoll, SBozzo, AGray, LRobock, AStenchikov, GThe ability of the climate models submitted to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) database to simulate the Northern Hemisphere winter climate following a large tropical volcanic eruption is assessed. When sulfate aerosols are produced by volcanic injections into the tropical stratosphere and spread by the stratospheric circulation, it not only causes globally averaged tropospheric cooling but also a localized heating in the lower stratosphere, which can cause major dynamical feedbacks. Observations show a lower stratospheric and surface response during the following one or two Northern Hemisphere (NH) winters, that resembles the positive phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). Simulations from 13 CMIP5 models that represent tropical eruptions in the 19th and 20th century are examined, focusing on the large-scale regional impacts associated with the large-scale circulation during the NH winter season. The models generally fail to capture the NH dynamical response following eruptions. They do not sufficiently simulate the observed post-volcanic strengthened NH polar vortex, positive NAO, or NH Eurasian warming pattern, and they tend to overestimate the cooling in the tropical troposphere. The findings are confirmed by a superposed epoch analysis of the NAO index for each model. The study confirms previous similar evaluations and raises concern for the ability of current climate models to simulate the response of a major mode of global circulation variability to external forcings. This is also of concern for the accuracy of geoengineering modeling studies that assess the atmospheric response to stratosphere-injected particles. © 2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
spellingShingle Driscoll, S
Bozzo, A
Gray, L
Robock, A
Stenchikov, G
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title_full Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title_fullStr Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title_full_unstemmed Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title_short Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
title_sort coupled model intercomparison project 5 cmip5 simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions
work_keys_str_mv AT driscolls coupledmodelintercomparisonproject5cmip5simulationsofclimatefollowingvolcaniceruptions
AT bozzoa coupledmodelintercomparisonproject5cmip5simulationsofclimatefollowingvolcaniceruptions
AT grayl coupledmodelintercomparisonproject5cmip5simulationsofclimatefollowingvolcaniceruptions
AT robocka coupledmodelintercomparisonproject5cmip5simulationsofclimatefollowingvolcaniceruptions
AT stenchikovg coupledmodelintercomparisonproject5cmip5simulationsofclimatefollowingvolcaniceruptions