Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
<strong>Objective</strong> To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m2) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. <strong>Methods</strong> We carried out a national prosp...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826270239447318528 |
|---|---|
| author | Rowe, R Knight, M Kurinczuk, J |
| author_facet | Rowe, R Knight, M Kurinczuk, J |
| author_sort | Rowe, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <strong>Objective</strong> To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m2) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. <strong>Methods</strong> We carried out a national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) in all 122 AMUs in the UK. We identified and collected data about 1122 severely obese women admitted to an AMU, 1st January-31st December 2016, and 1949 comparison women (BMI≤35kg/m2), matched on time of admission, and used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. <strong>Results</strong> 92% of the severely obese cohort had BMI 35.1-40kg/m2. Severely obese multiparous women were no more likely than comparison women to experience the composite primary outcome (one or more of: augmentation, instrumental birth, Caesarean, maternal blood transfusion, 3rd/4th degree tear, maternal admission to higher level care) (5.6% vs. 8.1%, aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.07). For severely obese nulliparous women we found a non-significant 14% increased risk of the primary outcome (37.6% vs 34.8%, aRR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.97–1.33). High proportions of severely obese women had a ‘straightforward vaginal birth’ (nulliparous 67.9%; multiparous 96.3%). Severely obese women were more likely than comparison women to have an intrapartum Casearean section, but Caesarean section rates were low and the absolute difference small (4.7% vs 4.1%; aRR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02–2.57). In nulliparous women, severely obese women were more likely to have an urgent Caesarean section (12.2% vs. 6.5%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.08), or a PPH≥1500ml (5.1% vs. 1.7%, aRR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.24–7.31). <strong>Conclusions</strong> We found no evidence of significantly increased risk associated with planning birth in an AMU for carefully selected multiparous severely obese women, with BMI 35.1-40kg/m2. Severely obese nulliparous women have a potential increased risk of having a more urgent Caesarean section or severe PPH compared with other women admitted to AMUs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:37:44Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:46d93ff1-ee3e-4dc7-8035-2d8f7dff36aa |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:37:44Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:46d93ff1-ee3e-4dc7-8035-2d8f7dff36aa2022-03-26T15:16:18ZOutcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:46d93ff1-ee3e-4dc7-8035-2d8f7dff36aaSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2018Rowe, RKnight, MKurinczuk, J<strong>Objective</strong> To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m2) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. <strong>Methods</strong> We carried out a national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) in all 122 AMUs in the UK. We identified and collected data about 1122 severely obese women admitted to an AMU, 1st January-31st December 2016, and 1949 comparison women (BMI≤35kg/m2), matched on time of admission, and used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. <strong>Results</strong> 92% of the severely obese cohort had BMI 35.1-40kg/m2. Severely obese multiparous women were no more likely than comparison women to experience the composite primary outcome (one or more of: augmentation, instrumental birth, Caesarean, maternal blood transfusion, 3rd/4th degree tear, maternal admission to higher level care) (5.6% vs. 8.1%, aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.07). For severely obese nulliparous women we found a non-significant 14% increased risk of the primary outcome (37.6% vs 34.8%, aRR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.97–1.33). High proportions of severely obese women had a ‘straightforward vaginal birth’ (nulliparous 67.9%; multiparous 96.3%). Severely obese women were more likely than comparison women to have an intrapartum Casearean section, but Caesarean section rates were low and the absolute difference small (4.7% vs 4.1%; aRR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02–2.57). In nulliparous women, severely obese women were more likely to have an urgent Caesarean section (12.2% vs. 6.5%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.08), or a PPH≥1500ml (5.1% vs. 1.7%, aRR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.24–7.31). <strong>Conclusions</strong> We found no evidence of significantly increased risk associated with planning birth in an AMU for carefully selected multiparous severely obese women, with BMI 35.1-40kg/m2. Severely obese nulliparous women have a potential increased risk of having a more urgent Caesarean section or severe PPH compared with other women admitted to AMUs. |
| spellingShingle | Rowe, R Knight, M Kurinczuk, J Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title | Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title_full | Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title_fullStr | Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title_short | Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) |
| title_sort | outcomes for women with bmi gt 35kg m2 admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the uk a national prospective cohort study using the uk midwifery study system ukmidss |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rower outcomesforwomenwithbmigt35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss AT knightm outcomesforwomenwithbmigt35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss AT kurinczukj outcomesforwomenwithbmigt35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss |