Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution

Blocking of the tropospheric jet stream during Northern Hemisphere winter (December-January-February) is examined in a multi-model ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (GCMs) obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The CMIP5 models exhibit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anstey, J, Davini, P, Gray, L, Woollings, T, Butchart, N, Cagnazzo, C, Christiansen, B, Hardiman, S, Osprey, S, Yang, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
_version_ 1797066147772760064
author Anstey, J
Davini, P
Gray, L
Woollings, T
Butchart, N
Cagnazzo, C
Christiansen, B
Hardiman, S
Osprey, S
Yang, S
author_facet Anstey, J
Davini, P
Gray, L
Woollings, T
Butchart, N
Cagnazzo, C
Christiansen, B
Hardiman, S
Osprey, S
Yang, S
author_sort Anstey, J
collection OXFORD
description Blocking of the tropospheric jet stream during Northern Hemisphere winter (December-January-February) is examined in a multi-model ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (GCMs) obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The CMIP5 models exhibit large biases in blocking frequency and related biases in tropospheric jet latitude, similar to earlier generations of GCMs. Underestimated blocking at high latitudes, especially over Europe, is common. In general, model biases decrease as model resolution increases. Increased blocking frequency at high latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific basins, as well as more realistic variability of Atlantic jet latitude, are associated with increased vertical resolution in the mid-troposphere to lowermost stratosphere. Finer horizontal resolution is associated with higher blocking frequency at all latitudes in the Atlantic basin but appears to have no systematic impact on blocking near Greenland or in the Pacific basin. Results from the CMIP5 analysis are corroborated by additional controlled experiments using selected GCMs. Key PointsCMIP5 models have large blocking biases and associated jet biasesIncreased spatial resolution is associated with reduced blocking and jet biasesVertical and horizontal resolution give blocking changes in different regions ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:38:15Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:47024cc1-4328-4a8b-85ca-9a54b7cc4ed9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:38:15Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:47024cc1-4328-4a8b-85ca-9a54b7cc4ed92022-03-26T15:17:22ZMulti-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolutionJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:47024cc1-4328-4a8b-85ca-9a54b7cc4ed9EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBlackwell Publishing Ltd2013Anstey, JDavini, PGray, LWoollings, TButchart, NCagnazzo, CChristiansen, BHardiman, SOsprey, SYang, SBlocking of the tropospheric jet stream during Northern Hemisphere winter (December-January-February) is examined in a multi-model ensemble of coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (GCMs) obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The CMIP5 models exhibit large biases in blocking frequency and related biases in tropospheric jet latitude, similar to earlier generations of GCMs. Underestimated blocking at high latitudes, especially over Europe, is common. In general, model biases decrease as model resolution increases. Increased blocking frequency at high latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific basins, as well as more realistic variability of Atlantic jet latitude, are associated with increased vertical resolution in the mid-troposphere to lowermost stratosphere. Finer horizontal resolution is associated with higher blocking frequency at all latitudes in the Atlantic basin but appears to have no systematic impact on blocking near Greenland or in the Pacific basin. Results from the CMIP5 analysis are corroborated by additional controlled experiments using selected GCMs. Key PointsCMIP5 models have large blocking biases and associated jet biasesIncreased spatial resolution is associated with reduced blocking and jet biasesVertical and horizontal resolution give blocking changes in different regions ©2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
spellingShingle Anstey, J
Davini, P
Gray, L
Woollings, T
Butchart, N
Cagnazzo, C
Christiansen, B
Hardiman, S
Osprey, S
Yang, S
Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title_full Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title_fullStr Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title_full_unstemmed Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title_short Multi-model analysis of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking: Model biases and the role of resolution
title_sort multi model analysis of northern hemisphere winter blocking model biases and the role of resolution
work_keys_str_mv AT ansteyj multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT davinip multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT grayl multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT woollingst multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT butchartn multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT cagnazzoc multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT christiansenb multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT hardimans multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT ospreys multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution
AT yangs multimodelanalysisofnorthernhemispherewinterblockingmodelbiasesandtheroleofresolution