Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.

<h4>Background</h4> <p>Health systems worldwide struggle to identify, adopt, and implement in a timely and system-wide manner the best—evidence-informed—policy-level practices. Yet, there is still only limited evidence about individual and institutional best practices for fosterin...

Ամբողջական նկարագրություն

Մատենագիտական մանրամասներ
Հիմնական հեղինակներ: Contandriopoulos, D, Benoît, F, Bryant-Lukosius, D, Carrier, A, Carter, N, Deber, R, Duhoux, A, Greenhalgh, T, Larouche, C, Leclerc, B, Levy, A, Martin-Misener, R, Maximova, K, McGrail, K, Nykiforuk, C, Roos, N, Schwartz, R, Valente, T, Wong, S, Lindquist, E, Pullen, C, Lardeux, A, Perroux, M
Ձևաչափ: Journal article
Լեզու:English
Հրապարակվել է: BioMed Central 2017
_version_ 1826270471518158848
author Contandriopoulos, D
Benoît, F
Bryant-Lukosius, D
Carrier, A
Carter, N
Deber, R
Duhoux, A
Greenhalgh, T
Larouche, C
Leclerc, B
Levy, A
Martin-Misener, R
Maximova, K
McGrail, K
Nykiforuk, C
Roos, N
Schwartz, R
Valente, T
Wong, S
Lindquist, E
Pullen, C
Lardeux, A
Perroux, M
author_facet Contandriopoulos, D
Benoît, F
Bryant-Lukosius, D
Carrier, A
Carter, N
Deber, R
Duhoux, A
Greenhalgh, T
Larouche, C
Leclerc, B
Levy, A
Martin-Misener, R
Maximova, K
McGrail, K
Nykiforuk, C
Roos, N
Schwartz, R
Valente, T
Wong, S
Lindquist, E
Pullen, C
Lardeux, A
Perroux, M
author_sort Contandriopoulos, D
collection OXFORD
description <h4>Background</h4> <p>Health systems worldwide struggle to identify, adopt, and implement in a timely and system-wide manner the best—evidence-informed—policy-level practices. Yet, there is still only limited evidence about individual and institutional best practices for fostering the use of scientific evidence in policy-making processes The present project is the first national-level attempt to (1) map and structurally analyze—quantitatively—health-relevant policymaking networks that connect evidence production, synthesis, interpretation, and use; (2) qualitatively investigate the interaction patterns of a subsample of actors with high centrality metrics within these networks to develop an in-depth understanding of evidence circulation processes; and (3) combine these findings in order to assess a policy network’s “absorptive capacity” regarding scientific evidence and integrate them into a conceptually sound and empirically grounded framework.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The project is divided into two research components. The first component is based on quantitative analysis of ties (relationships) that link nodes (participants) in a network. Network data will be collected through a multi-step snowball sampling strategy. Data will be analyzed structurally using social network mapping and analysis methods. The second component is based on qualitative interviews with a subsample of the Web survey participants having central, bridging, or atypical positions in the network. Interviews will focus on the process through which evidence circulates and enters practice. Results from both components will then be integrated through an assessment of the network’s and subnetwork’s effectiveness in identifying, capturing, interpreting, sharing, reframing, and recodifying scientific evidence in policy-making processes.</p> <h4>Discussion</h4> <p>Knowledge developed from this project has the potential both to strengthen the scientific understanding of how policy-level knowledge transfer and exchange functions and to provide significantly improved advice on how to ensure evidence plays a more prominent role in public policies.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:41:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:480d065b-df23-4c85-9ad3-a49c56e086f5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:41:21Z
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:480d065b-df23-4c85-9ad3-a49c56e086f52022-03-26T15:23:25ZStructural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:480d065b-df23-4c85-9ad3-a49c56e086f5EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2017Contandriopoulos, DBenoît, FBryant-Lukosius, DCarrier, ACarter, NDeber, RDuhoux, AGreenhalgh, TLarouche, CLeclerc, BLevy, AMartin-Misener, RMaximova, KMcGrail, KNykiforuk, CRoos, NSchwartz, RValente, TWong, SLindquist, EPullen, CLardeux, APerroux, M <h4>Background</h4> <p>Health systems worldwide struggle to identify, adopt, and implement in a timely and system-wide manner the best—evidence-informed—policy-level practices. Yet, there is still only limited evidence about individual and institutional best practices for fostering the use of scientific evidence in policy-making processes The present project is the first national-level attempt to (1) map and structurally analyze—quantitatively—health-relevant policymaking networks that connect evidence production, synthesis, interpretation, and use; (2) qualitatively investigate the interaction patterns of a subsample of actors with high centrality metrics within these networks to develop an in-depth understanding of evidence circulation processes; and (3) combine these findings in order to assess a policy network’s “absorptive capacity” regarding scientific evidence and integrate them into a conceptually sound and empirically grounded framework.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>The project is divided into two research components. The first component is based on quantitative analysis of ties (relationships) that link nodes (participants) in a network. Network data will be collected through a multi-step snowball sampling strategy. Data will be analyzed structurally using social network mapping and analysis methods. The second component is based on qualitative interviews with a subsample of the Web survey participants having central, bridging, or atypical positions in the network. Interviews will focus on the process through which evidence circulates and enters practice. Results from both components will then be integrated through an assessment of the network’s and subnetwork’s effectiveness in identifying, capturing, interpreting, sharing, reframing, and recodifying scientific evidence in policy-making processes.</p> <h4>Discussion</h4> <p>Knowledge developed from this project has the potential both to strengthen the scientific understanding of how policy-level knowledge transfer and exchange functions and to provide significantly improved advice on how to ensure evidence plays a more prominent role in public policies.</p>
spellingShingle Contandriopoulos, D
Benoît, F
Bryant-Lukosius, D
Carrier, A
Carter, N
Deber, R
Duhoux, A
Greenhalgh, T
Larouche, C
Leclerc, B
Levy, A
Martin-Misener, R
Maximova, K
McGrail, K
Nykiforuk, C
Roos, N
Schwartz, R
Valente, T
Wong, S
Lindquist, E
Pullen, C
Lardeux, A
Perroux, M
Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title_full Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title_fullStr Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title_full_unstemmed Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title_short Structural analysis of health-relevant policy-making information exchange networks in Canada.
title_sort structural analysis of health relevant policy making information exchange networks in canada
work_keys_str_mv AT contandriopoulosd structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT benoitf structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT bryantlukosiusd structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT carriera structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT cartern structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT deberr structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT duhouxa structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT greenhalght structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT larouchec structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT leclercb structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT levya structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT martinmisenerr structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT maximovak structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT mcgrailk structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT nykiforukc structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT roosn structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT schwartzr structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT valentet structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT wongs structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT lindquiste structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT pullenc structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT lardeuxa structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada
AT perrouxm structuralanalysisofhealthrelevantpolicymakinginformationexchangenetworksincanada