Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class

Perhaps the most prevailing inequalities in educational achievement in England are those associated with socio-economic status (SES), ethnicity and gender. However, little research has sought to compare the relative size of these gaps or to explore interactions between these factors. This paper anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Strand, S
Format: Journal article
Published: Routledge 2014
_version_ 1797066409319071744
author Strand, S
author_facet Strand, S
author_sort Strand, S
collection OXFORD
description Perhaps the most prevailing inequalities in educational achievement in England are those associated with socio-economic status (SES), ethnicity and gender. However, little research has sought to compare the relative size of these gaps or to explore interactions between these factors. This paper analyses the educational achievement at age 11, 14 and 16 of over 15,000 students from the nationally representative longitudinal study of young people in England. At age 16, the achievement gap associated with social class was twice as large as the biggest ethnic gap and six times as large as the gender gap. However, the results indicate that ethnicity, gender and SES do not combine in a simple additive fashion; rather, there are substantial interactions particularly between ethnicity and SES and between ethnicity and gender. At age 16 among low SES students, all ethnic minority groups achieve significantly better than White British students (except Black Caribbean boys who do not differ from White British boys), but at high SES only Indian students outperform White British students. A similar pattern of results was apparent in terms of progress age 11-16, with White British low SES students and Black Caribbean boys (particularly the more able) making the least progress. Parents' educational aspirations for their child and students' own educational aspirations, academic self-concept, frequency of completing homework, truancy and exclusion could account for the minority ethnic advantage at low SES, but conditioning on such factors simultaneously indicates substantial ethnic underachievement at average and high SES. Accounts of educational achievement framed exclusively in terms of social class, ethnicity or gender are insufficient, and the results challenge educational researchers to develop more nuanced accounts of educational success or failure.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:41:38Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4822b2c2-3ce0-4cf2-b985-9b8aa16b37b8
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:41:38Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4822b2c2-3ce0-4cf2-b985-9b8aa16b37b82022-03-26T15:23:56ZEthnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working classJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4822b2c2-3ce0-4cf2-b985-9b8aa16b37b8Symplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2014Strand, SPerhaps the most prevailing inequalities in educational achievement in England are those associated with socio-economic status (SES), ethnicity and gender. However, little research has sought to compare the relative size of these gaps or to explore interactions between these factors. This paper analyses the educational achievement at age 11, 14 and 16 of over 15,000 students from the nationally representative longitudinal study of young people in England. At age 16, the achievement gap associated with social class was twice as large as the biggest ethnic gap and six times as large as the gender gap. However, the results indicate that ethnicity, gender and SES do not combine in a simple additive fashion; rather, there are substantial interactions particularly between ethnicity and SES and between ethnicity and gender. At age 16 among low SES students, all ethnic minority groups achieve significantly better than White British students (except Black Caribbean boys who do not differ from White British boys), but at high SES only Indian students outperform White British students. A similar pattern of results was apparent in terms of progress age 11-16, with White British low SES students and Black Caribbean boys (particularly the more able) making the least progress. Parents' educational aspirations for their child and students' own educational aspirations, academic self-concept, frequency of completing homework, truancy and exclusion could account for the minority ethnic advantage at low SES, but conditioning on such factors simultaneously indicates substantial ethnic underachievement at average and high SES. Accounts of educational achievement framed exclusively in terms of social class, ethnicity or gender are insufficient, and the results challenge educational researchers to develop more nuanced accounts of educational success or failure.
spellingShingle Strand, S
Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title_full Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title_fullStr Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title_full_unstemmed Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title_short Ethnicity, gender, social class and achievement gaps at age 16: intersectionality and 'getting it' for the white working class
title_sort ethnicity gender social class and achievement gaps at age 16 intersectionality and getting it for the white working class
work_keys_str_mv AT strands ethnicitygendersocialclassandachievementgapsatage16intersectionalityandgettingitforthewhiteworkingclass