Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis

Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease worldwide, but currently available diagnostics have suboptimal accuracy, particularly in patients unable to expectorate, and are often unavailable at the point-of-care in resource-limited settings. Test/treatment decision are, therefore, often made on clini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basile, FW, Sweeney, S, Singh, MP, Bijker, EM, Cohen, T, Menzies, NA, Vassall, A, Indravudh, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2024
_version_ 1811140115701956608
author Basile, FW
Sweeney, S
Singh, MP
Bijker, EM
Cohen, T
Menzies, NA
Vassall, A
Indravudh, P
author_facet Basile, FW
Sweeney, S
Singh, MP
Bijker, EM
Cohen, T
Menzies, NA
Vassall, A
Indravudh, P
author_sort Basile, FW
collection OXFORD
description Tuberculosis is a major infectious disease worldwide, but currently available diagnostics have suboptimal accuracy, particularly in patients unable to expectorate, and are often unavailable at the point-of-care in resource-limited settings. Test/treatment decision are, therefore, often made on clinical grounds. We hypothesized that contextual factors beyond disease probability may influence clinical decisions about when to test and when to treat for tuberculosis. This umbrella review aimed to identify such factors, and to develop a framework for uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making. Systematic reviews were searched in seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PROSPERO, Epistemonikos) using predetermined search criteria. Findings were classified as barriers and facilitators for testing or treatment decisions, and thematically analysed based on a multi-level model of uncertainty in health care. We included 27 reviews. Study designs and primary aims were heterogeneous, with seven meta-analyses and three qualitative evidence syntheses. Facilitators for decisions to test included providers’ advanced professional qualification and confidence in tests results, availability of automated diagnostics with quick turnaround times. Common barriers for requesting a diagnostic test included: poor provider tuberculosis knowledge, fear of acquiring tuberculosis through respiratory sampling, scarcity of healthcare resources, and complexity of specimen collection. Facilitators for empiric treatment included patients’ young age, severe sickness, and test inaccessibility. Main barriers to treatment included communication obstacles, providers’ high confidence in negative test results (irrespective of negative predictive value). Multiple sources of uncertainty were identified at the patient, provider, diagnostic test, and healthcare system levels. Complex determinants of uncertainty influenced decision-making. This could result in delayed or missed diagnosis and treatment opportunities. It is important to understand the variability associated with patient-provider clinical encounters and healthcare settings, clinicians’ attitudes, and experiences, as well as diagnostic test characteristics, to improve clinical practices, and allow an impactful introduction of novel diagnostics.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:16:51Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4825b264-b2f5-4141-a291-a423ba7b9fe2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:16:51Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4825b264-b2f5-4141-a291-a423ba7b9fe22024-07-23T19:36:08ZUncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4825b264-b2f5-4141-a291-a423ba7b9fe2EnglishJisc Publications RouterPublic Library of Science2024Basile, FWSweeney, SSingh, MPBijker, EMCohen, TMenzies, NAVassall, AIndravudh, PTuberculosis is a major infectious disease worldwide, but currently available diagnostics have suboptimal accuracy, particularly in patients unable to expectorate, and are often unavailable at the point-of-care in resource-limited settings. Test/treatment decision are, therefore, often made on clinical grounds. We hypothesized that contextual factors beyond disease probability may influence clinical decisions about when to test and when to treat for tuberculosis. This umbrella review aimed to identify such factors, and to develop a framework for uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making. Systematic reviews were searched in seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, PROSPERO, Epistemonikos) using predetermined search criteria. Findings were classified as barriers and facilitators for testing or treatment decisions, and thematically analysed based on a multi-level model of uncertainty in health care. We included 27 reviews. Study designs and primary aims were heterogeneous, with seven meta-analyses and three qualitative evidence syntheses. Facilitators for decisions to test included providers’ advanced professional qualification and confidence in tests results, availability of automated diagnostics with quick turnaround times. Common barriers for requesting a diagnostic test included: poor provider tuberculosis knowledge, fear of acquiring tuberculosis through respiratory sampling, scarcity of healthcare resources, and complexity of specimen collection. Facilitators for empiric treatment included patients’ young age, severe sickness, and test inaccessibility. Main barriers to treatment included communication obstacles, providers’ high confidence in negative test results (irrespective of negative predictive value). Multiple sources of uncertainty were identified at the patient, provider, diagnostic test, and healthcare system levels. Complex determinants of uncertainty influenced decision-making. This could result in delayed or missed diagnosis and treatment opportunities. It is important to understand the variability associated with patient-provider clinical encounters and healthcare settings, clinicians’ attitudes, and experiences, as well as diagnostic test characteristics, to improve clinical practices, and allow an impactful introduction of novel diagnostics.
spellingShingle Basile, FW
Sweeney, S
Singh, MP
Bijker, EM
Cohen, T
Menzies, NA
Vassall, A
Indravudh, P
Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title_full Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title_fullStr Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title_short Uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision-making: An umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
title_sort uncertainty in tuberculosis clinical decision making an umbrella review with systematic methods and thematic analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT basilefw uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT sweeneys uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT singhmp uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT bijkerem uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT cohent uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT menziesna uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT vassalla uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis
AT indravudhp uncertaintyintuberculosisclinicaldecisionmakinganumbrellareviewwithsystematicmethodsandthematicanalysis