Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets

Mutual funds sold via brokers offer fund portfolios that investors can purchase in one of three classes: A, B or C. These classes are distinguished only by their fee schedules and thus have different net performance results. An analysis of relative class performances for a set of U.S mutual funds be...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: Kahraman, B
स्वरूप: Journal article
भाषा:English
प्रकाशित: World Scientific Publishing 2020
_version_ 1826270528066813952
author Kahraman, B
author_facet Kahraman, B
author_sort Kahraman, B
collection OXFORD
description Mutual funds sold via brokers offer fund portfolios that investors can purchase in one of three classes: A, B or C. These classes are distinguished only by their fee schedules and thus have different net performance results. An analysis of relative class performances for a set of U.S mutual funds between 1992 and 2008 reveals a striking fact about class B: while classes A and C provide the best performance results at long and short holding periods, respectively, class B is dominated by either class A or C at any holding period. The inferiority yet popularity of class B at first suggests that naïve investors who do not understand the fee schedule of this class are being exploited. However, I propose two hypothetical clienteles which might rationally demand class B shares: one (a) with uncertain holding periods, or one (b) that desires to have long holding periods but is unable to commit to them. I identify whether investors rationally or naïvely purchase class B by examining the flow-fee sensitivity and estimating investor holding periods. My results support the naïve investor explanation.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:42:13Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:485285bf-8153-49a4-9e4f-420c1d8f1c67
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:42:13Z
publishDate 2020
publisher World Scientific Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:485285bf-8153-49a4-9e4f-420c1d8f1c672022-03-26T15:25:06ZFee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial marketsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:485285bf-8153-49a4-9e4f-420c1d8f1c67EnglishSymplectic ElementsWorld Scientific Publishing2020Kahraman, BMutual funds sold via brokers offer fund portfolios that investors can purchase in one of three classes: A, B or C. These classes are distinguished only by their fee schedules and thus have different net performance results. An analysis of relative class performances for a set of U.S mutual funds between 1992 and 2008 reveals a striking fact about class B: while classes A and C provide the best performance results at long and short holding periods, respectively, class B is dominated by either class A or C at any holding period. The inferiority yet popularity of class B at first suggests that naïve investors who do not understand the fee schedule of this class are being exploited. However, I propose two hypothetical clienteles which might rationally demand class B shares: one (a) with uncertain holding periods, or one (b) that desires to have long holding periods but is unable to commit to them. I identify whether investors rationally or naïvely purchase class B by examining the flow-fee sensitivity and estimating investor holding periods. My results support the naïve investor explanation.
spellingShingle Kahraman, B
Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title_full Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title_fullStr Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title_full_unstemmed Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title_short Fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
title_sort fee complexity and investor mistakes in retail financial markets
work_keys_str_mv AT kahramanb feecomplexityandinvestormistakesinretailfinancialmarkets