Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology.
The past five years have seen a growth in the interest in systems approaches in epidemiologic research. These approaches may be particularly appropriate for social epidemiology. Social network analysis and agent-based models (ABMs) are two approaches that have been used in the epidemiologic literat...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1826270611956039680 |
|---|---|
| author | El-Sayed, A Scarborough, P Seemann, L Galea, S |
| author_facet | El-Sayed, A Scarborough, P Seemann, L Galea, S |
| author_sort | El-Sayed, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The past five years have seen a growth in the interest in systems approaches in epidemiologic research. These approaches may be particularly appropriate for social epidemiology. Social network analysis and agent-based models (ABMs) are two approaches that have been used in the epidemiologic literature. Social network analysis involves the characterization of social networks to yield inference about how network structures may influence risk exposures among those in the network. ABMs can promote population-level inference from explicitly programmed, micro-level rules in simulated populations over time and space. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of these models in social epidemiologic research, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Network analysis may be ideal for understanding social contagion, as well as the influences of social interaction on population health. However, network analysis requires network data, which may sacrifice generalizability, and causal inference from current network analytic methods is limited. ABMs are uniquely suited for the assessment of health determinants at multiple levels of influence that may couple with social interaction to produce population health. ABMs allow for the exploration of feedback and reciprocity between exposures and outcomes in the etiology of complex diseases. They may also provide the opportunity for counterfactual simulation. However, appropriate implementation of ABMs requires a balance between mechanistic rigor and model parsimony, and the precision of output from complex models is limited. Social network and agent-based approaches are promising in social epidemiology, but continued development of each approach is needed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:43:34Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:48c7378d-7c6b-497d-a4db-c99239925dec |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:43:34Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:48c7378d-7c6b-497d-a4db-c99239925dec2022-03-26T15:27:40ZSocial network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:48c7378d-7c6b-497d-a4db-c99239925decEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012El-Sayed, AScarborough, PSeemann, LGalea, S The past five years have seen a growth in the interest in systems approaches in epidemiologic research. These approaches may be particularly appropriate for social epidemiology. Social network analysis and agent-based models (ABMs) are two approaches that have been used in the epidemiologic literature. Social network analysis involves the characterization of social networks to yield inference about how network structures may influence risk exposures among those in the network. ABMs can promote population-level inference from explicitly programmed, micro-level rules in simulated populations over time and space. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of these models in social epidemiologic research, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Network analysis may be ideal for understanding social contagion, as well as the influences of social interaction on population health. However, network analysis requires network data, which may sacrifice generalizability, and causal inference from current network analytic methods is limited. ABMs are uniquely suited for the assessment of health determinants at multiple levels of influence that may couple with social interaction to produce population health. ABMs allow for the exploration of feedback and reciprocity between exposures and outcomes in the etiology of complex diseases. They may also provide the opportunity for counterfactual simulation. However, appropriate implementation of ABMs requires a balance between mechanistic rigor and model parsimony, and the precision of output from complex models is limited. Social network and agent-based approaches are promising in social epidemiology, but continued development of each approach is needed. |
| spellingShingle | El-Sayed, A Scarborough, P Seemann, L Galea, S Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title | Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title_full | Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title_fullStr | Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title_short | Social network analysis and agent-based modeling in social epidemiology. |
| title_sort | social network analysis and agent based modeling in social epidemiology |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elsayeda socialnetworkanalysisandagentbasedmodelinginsocialepidemiology AT scarboroughp socialnetworkanalysisandagentbasedmodelinginsocialepidemiology AT seemannl socialnetworkanalysisandagentbasedmodelinginsocialepidemiology AT galeas socialnetworkanalysisandagentbasedmodelinginsocialepidemiology |