The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.

High-affinity, high-selectivity protein-protein interactions that are critical for cell survival present an evolutionary paradox: How does selectivity evolve when acquired mutations risk a lethal loss of high-affinity binding? A detailed understanding of selectivity in such complexes requires struct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meenan, N, Sharma, A, Fleishman, S, Macdonald, C, Morel, B, Boetzel, R, Moore, G, Baker, D, Kleanthous, K
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2010
_version_ 1797066759594835968
author Meenan, N
Sharma, A
Fleishman, S
Macdonald, C
Morel, B
Boetzel, R
Moore, G
Baker, D
Kleanthous, K
author_facet Meenan, N
Sharma, A
Fleishman, S
Macdonald, C
Morel, B
Boetzel, R
Moore, G
Baker, D
Kleanthous, K
author_sort Meenan, N
collection OXFORD
description High-affinity, high-selectivity protein-protein interactions that are critical for cell survival present an evolutionary paradox: How does selectivity evolve when acquired mutations risk a lethal loss of high-affinity binding? A detailed understanding of selectivity in such complexes requires structural information on weak, noncognate complexes which can be difficult to obtain due to their transient and dynamic nature. Using NMR-based docking as a guide, we deployed a disulfide-trapping strategy on a noncognate complex between the colicin E9 endonuclease (E9 DNase) and immunity protein 2 (Im2), which is seven orders of magnitude weaker binding than the cognate femtomolar E9 DNase-Im9 interaction. The 1.77 A crystal structure of the E9 DNase-Im2 complex reveals an entirely noncovalent interface where the intersubunit disulfide merely supports the crystal lattice. In combination with computational alanine scanning of interfacial residues, the structure reveals that the driving force for binding is so strong that a severely unfavorable specificity contact is tolerated at the interface and as a result the complex becomes weakened through "frustration." As well as rationalizing past mutational and thermodynamic data, comparing our noncognate structure with previous cognate complexes highlights the importance of loop regions in developing selectivity and accentuates the multiple roles of buried water molecules that stabilize, ameliorate, or aggravate interfacial contacts. The study provides direct support for dual-recognition in colicin DNase-Im protein complexes and shows that weakened noncognate complexes are primed for high-affinity binding, which can be achieved by economical mutation of a limited number of residues at the interface.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:46:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:49d09acb-6a89-43dd-831f-2d42f70e4d99
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:46:36Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:49d09acb-6a89-43dd-831f-2d42f70e4d992022-03-26T15:33:52ZThe structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:49d09acb-6a89-43dd-831f-2d42f70e4d99EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Meenan, NSharma, AFleishman, SMacdonald, CMorel, BBoetzel, RMoore, GBaker, DKleanthous, KHigh-affinity, high-selectivity protein-protein interactions that are critical for cell survival present an evolutionary paradox: How does selectivity evolve when acquired mutations risk a lethal loss of high-affinity binding? A detailed understanding of selectivity in such complexes requires structural information on weak, noncognate complexes which can be difficult to obtain due to their transient and dynamic nature. Using NMR-based docking as a guide, we deployed a disulfide-trapping strategy on a noncognate complex between the colicin E9 endonuclease (E9 DNase) and immunity protein 2 (Im2), which is seven orders of magnitude weaker binding than the cognate femtomolar E9 DNase-Im9 interaction. The 1.77 A crystal structure of the E9 DNase-Im2 complex reveals an entirely noncovalent interface where the intersubunit disulfide merely supports the crystal lattice. In combination with computational alanine scanning of interfacial residues, the structure reveals that the driving force for binding is so strong that a severely unfavorable specificity contact is tolerated at the interface and as a result the complex becomes weakened through "frustration." As well as rationalizing past mutational and thermodynamic data, comparing our noncognate structure with previous cognate complexes highlights the importance of loop regions in developing selectivity and accentuates the multiple roles of buried water molecules that stabilize, ameliorate, or aggravate interfacial contacts. The study provides direct support for dual-recognition in colicin DNase-Im protein complexes and shows that weakened noncognate complexes are primed for high-affinity binding, which can be achieved by economical mutation of a limited number of residues at the interface.
spellingShingle Meenan, N
Sharma, A
Fleishman, S
Macdonald, C
Morel, B
Boetzel, R
Moore, G
Baker, D
Kleanthous, K
The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title_full The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title_fullStr The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title_full_unstemmed The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title_short The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.
title_sort structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high affinity protein protein interaction
work_keys_str_mv AT meenann thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT sharmaa thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT fleishmans thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT macdonaldc thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT morelb thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT boetzelr thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT mooreg thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT bakerd thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT kleanthousk thestructuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT meenann structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT sharmaa structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT fleishmans structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT macdonaldc structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT morelb structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT boetzelr structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT mooreg structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT bakerd structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction
AT kleanthousk structuralandenergeticbasisforhighselectivityinahighaffinityproteinproteininteraction