Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing.
Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour format...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2010
|
| _version_ | 1797066791811284992 |
|---|---|
| author | Grammatopoulos, G Pandit, H Glyn-Jones, S McLardy-Smith, P Gundle, R Whitwell, D Gill, H Murray, D |
| author_facet | Grammatopoulos, G Pandit, H Glyn-Jones, S McLardy-Smith, P Gundle, R Whitwell, D Gill, H Murray, D |
| author_sort | Grammatopoulos, G |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Pseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation. We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47 degrees, 10 degrees to 81 degrees) and anteversion angle (14 degrees, 4 degrees to 34 degrees) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46 degrees (29 degrees to 60 degrees) and 16 degrees (4 degrees to 30 degrees) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of +/- 10 degrees about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone. In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45 degrees (+/- 10) and anteversion of 20 degrees (+/- 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40 degrees and an anteversion of 25 degrees. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:47:04Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:49f52911-f239-4ddd-97b4-bb90e8d77701 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:47:04Z |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:49f52911-f239-4ddd-97b4-bb90e8d777012022-03-26T15:34:58ZOptimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:49f52911-f239-4ddd-97b4-bb90e8d77701EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2010Grammatopoulos, GPandit, HGlyn-Jones, SMcLardy-Smith, PGundle, RWhitwell, DGill, HMurray, DPseudotumours are a rare complication of hip resurfacing. They are thought to be a response to metal debris which may be caused by edge loading due to poor orientation of the acetabular component. Our aim was to determine the optimal acetabular orientation to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation. We matched 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumour formation with 58 controls who had a satisfactory outcome from this procedure. The radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse software. The mean inclination angle (47 degrees, 10 degrees to 81 degrees) and anteversion angle (14 degrees, 4 degrees to 34 degrees) of the pseudotumour cases were the same (p = 0.8, p = 0.2) as the controls, 46 degrees (29 degrees to 60 degrees) and 16 degrees (4 degrees to 30 degrees) respectively, but the variation was greater. Assuming an accuracy of implantation of +/- 10 degrees about a target position, the optimal radiographic position was found to be approximately 45 degrees of inclination and 20 degrees of anteversion. The incidence of pseudotumours inside the zone was four times lower (p = 0.007) than outside the zone. In order to minimise the risk of pseudotumour formation we recommend that surgeons implant the acetabular component at an inclination of 45 degrees (+/- 10) and anteversion of 20 degrees (+/- 10) on post-operative radiographs. Because of differences between the radiographic and the operative angles, this may be best achieved by aiming for an inclination of 40 degrees and an anteversion of 25 degrees. |
| spellingShingle | Grammatopoulos, G Pandit, H Glyn-Jones, S McLardy-Smith, P Gundle, R Whitwell, D Gill, H Murray, D Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title | Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title_full | Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title_fullStr | Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title_short | Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. |
| title_sort | optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT grammatopoulosg optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT pandith optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT glynjoness optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT mclardysmithp optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT gundler optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT whitwelld optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT gillh optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing AT murrayd optimalacetabularorientationforhipresurfacing |