‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy
For the concept of nature positive to succeed as the lodestar for international action on biodiversity conservation, it must build upon lessons learned from the application of the mitigation hierarchy — or risk becoming mere greenwash.
Principais autores: | Maron, M, Quétier, F, Sarmiento, M, ten Kate, K, Evans, MC, Bull, JW, Jones, JPG, Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Brownlie, S, Treweek, J, von Hase, A |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Springer Nature
2023
|
Registros relacionados
-
Analyzing the outcomes of China's ecological compensation scheme for development-related biodiversity loss
por: Gao, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2023) -
China makes developers pay compensation for their ecological impacts – here’s how this unique scheme works
por: Gao, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2023) -
No consistent relationship found between biodiversity metric habitat scores and the presence of species of conservation priority
por: Hawkins, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2022) -
Nature-based credit markets at a crossroads
por: Swinfield, T, et al.
Publicado em: (2024) -
Evaluating the impact of biodiversity offsetting on native vegetation
por: Zu Ermgassen, SOSE, et al.
Publicado em: (2023)