Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.

Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: We describe a review of published main reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in order to measure the frequency of reported use of data monitoring committees (DMCs) and factors associated with reported DMC use. METHODS: Twenty-four higher impact general and specialist medical j...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Sydes, MR, Altman, D, Babiker, AB, Parmar, M, Spiegelhalter, D
Format:	Journal article
Jezik:	English
Izdano:	2004

Podobne knjige/članki

Systematic qualitative review of the literature on data monitoring committees for randomized controlled trials.
od: Sydes, MR, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials.
od: Grant, A, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials
od: A Grant, et al.
Izdano: (2005-03-01)

Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials.
od: Hopewell, S, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Reporting of participant flow diagrams in published reports of randomized trials
od: Hopewell Sally, et al.
Izdano: (2011-12-01)

Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Monitoring of large randomised clinical trials: a new approach with Bayesian methods.
od: Parmar, M, et al.
Izdano: (2001)

Bayesian stopping rules for trials - Reply
od: Parmar, M, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials
od: Elizabeth J. Conroy, et al.
Izdano: (2017-12-01)

Lead editorial: trials - using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials.
od: Altman, D, et al.
Izdano: (2006)

Reporting the clinical importance of randomized controlled trials.
od: Moher, D, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
od: Turner, L, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials
od: Grimshaw Jeremy M, et al.
Izdano: (2006-03-01)

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Main report of the Regional Action Committee for North Peninsular Malaysia (RACNOM)/
od: Malaysia. Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Bahagian Perancang Ekonomi
Izdano: (1974)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
od: Mathieu, S, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Reporting of data monitoring committees and adverse events in paediatric trials: a descriptive analysis
od: Allison Gates, et al.
Izdano: (2019-12-01)

Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.
od: Calvert, M, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study.
od: Pildal, J, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

The use of interim data and Data Monitoring Committee recommendations in randomized controlled trial reports: frequency, implications and potential sources of bias
od: Hampton John, et al.
Izdano: (2008-03-01)

Are published randomized clinical trials abstracts on periodontics reported adequately?
od: Fahad Alharbi, et al.
Izdano: (2020-12-01)

Report of the committee

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature" or the SAMPL Guidelines.
od: Lang, T, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The "Statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines
od: Lang, T, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Report of the Committee (Committee on Highway Maintenance)
od: Great Britain. Ministry of Transport Committee on Highway Maintenance
Izdano: (1970)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review.
od: Hopewell, S, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Standard 3: data monitoring committees.
od: Ellenberg, S, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
od: Clarke, M, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.
od: Piaggio, G, et al.
Izdano: (2006)

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
od: Schulz, K, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Transparent reporting of trials is essential.
od: Altman, D
Izdano: (2013)

Transparency of Outcome Reporting and Trial Registration of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
od: Marleine Azar, et al.
Izdano: (2015-01-01)

Report of the Committee of Inquiry /

Report of the Footpaths Committee
od: Great Britain. Ministry of Housing and Local Government
Izdano: (1968)

People and planning : report of the committee on public participation in planning (The Skeffington Committee Report) /
od: Great Britain. Committee on Public Participation in Planning, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Reporting of multi-arm parallel-group randomized trials: Extension of the consort 2010 statement
od: Juszczak, E, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
od: Savage, D, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

REPORTING OF CONTINUOUS OUTCOME MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: IS THE WHOLE STORY BEING TOLD?
od: Savage, D, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Resources for authors of reports of randomized trials: harnessing the wisdom of authors, editors, and readers.
od: Moher, D, et al.
Izdano: (2011)