Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials

The research focused on identifying trial characteristics leading to delayed publication of randomized comparisons, and hence publication bias. Time to first mention in an article (irrespective of whether results are given) and to first reporting of results were modelled using ordinary linear regres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burrett, J, Lunn, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
_version_ 1797067099928002560
author Burrett, J
Lunn, D
author_facet Burrett, J
Lunn, D
author_sort Burrett, J
collection OXFORD
description The research focused on identifying trial characteristics leading to delayed publication of randomized comparisons, and hence publication bias. Time to first mention in an article (irrespective of whether results are given) and to first reporting of results were modelled using ordinary linear regression (independence model). These analyses were extended to include all mentions and all reportings of results where non-independence necessitated using repeated measures techniques. The residuals from the independence model were used to construct a covariance matrix, thereby suggesting plausible correlation structures for repeated measures models. Results from two methods; generalized estimating equations (GEE) and linear mixed effects modelling, are compared. Problems caused by missing data and their solution are also discussed. This paper concentrates on methodology and the use of repeated measures techniques for incorporating appropriate correlation structures, rather than interpretation of findings, which is published separately. Application of the methods is described, as is the importance of the correct use of repeated measures analyses when an independence model is inappropriate; an independence model may approximate well to the final model, but should only be used to suggest useful correlation structures. Repeated measures methods are easily implemented, providing practical ways of dealing with correlated data.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:51:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4b6bd83b-49db-4765-9a65-74f9d18dbc6c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:51:28Z
publishDate 2015
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4b6bd83b-49db-4765-9a65-74f9d18dbc6c2022-03-26T15:43:30ZApplication of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4b6bd83b-49db-4765-9a65-74f9d18dbc6cArtStatisticsMedical SciencesEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2015Burrett, JLunn, DThe research focused on identifying trial characteristics leading to delayed publication of randomized comparisons, and hence publication bias. Time to first mention in an article (irrespective of whether results are given) and to first reporting of results were modelled using ordinary linear regression (independence model). These analyses were extended to include all mentions and all reportings of results where non-independence necessitated using repeated measures techniques. The residuals from the independence model were used to construct a covariance matrix, thereby suggesting plausible correlation structures for repeated measures models. Results from two methods; generalized estimating equations (GEE) and linear mixed effects modelling, are compared. Problems caused by missing data and their solution are also discussed. This paper concentrates on methodology and the use of repeated measures techniques for incorporating appropriate correlation structures, rather than interpretation of findings, which is published separately. Application of the methods is described, as is the importance of the correct use of repeated measures analyses when an independence model is inappropriate; an independence model may approximate well to the final model, but should only be used to suggest useful correlation structures. Repeated measures methods are easily implemented, providing practical ways of dealing with correlated data.
spellingShingle Art
Statistics
Medical Sciences
Burrett, J
Lunn, D
Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title_full Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title_short Application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
title_sort application of generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effects models to analysis of correlated data in the field of publication bias in the reporting of randomized clinical trials
topic Art
Statistics
Medical Sciences
work_keys_str_mv AT burrettj applicationofgeneralizedestimatingequationsandlinearmixedeffectsmodelstoanalysisofcorrelateddatainthefieldofpublicationbiasinthereportingofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT lunnd applicationofgeneralizedestimatingequationsandlinearmixedeffectsmodelstoanalysisofcorrelateddatainthefieldofpublicationbiasinthereportingofrandomizedclinicaltrials