Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations
In everyday life, we often anticipate the timing of an upcoming task or event while actively engaging in another. Here, we investigated the effects of predictable temporal structure within such a multi-task scenario. In a visual working-memory task, we manipulated whether the onset of a working-memo...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022
|
| _version_ | 1797106797817888768 |
|---|---|
| author | Gresch, D Boettcher, SEP Nobre, AC van Ede, F |
| author_facet | Gresch, D Boettcher, SEP Nobre, AC van Ede, F |
| author_sort | Gresch, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In everyday life, we often anticipate the timing of an upcoming task or event while actively engaging in another. Here, we investigated the effects of predictable temporal structure within such a multi-task scenario. In a visual working-memory task, we manipulated whether the onset of a working-memory probe could be predicted in time, while also embedding a simple intervening task within the delay period. We first show that working-memory performance benefitted from temporal expectations, even though an intervening task had to be completed in the interim. Moreover, temporal predictions regarding the upcoming working-memory probe additionally affected performance on the intervening task, resulting in faster responses when the memory probe was expected early, and slower responses when the memory probe was expected late, as compared to when it was temporally unpredictable. Because the intervening task always occurred at the same time during the memory delay, differences in performance on this intervening task result from a between-task consequence of temporal expectation. Thus, we show that within multi-task settings, knowing when working-memory contents will be required for an upcoming task not only facilitates performance of the associated working-memory task, but can also influence the performance of other, intervening tasks. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:06:03Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:4b875010-0f8d-4028-a3ab-f073075426f1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:06:03Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:4b875010-0f8d-4028-a3ab-f073075426f12022-05-11T12:20:43ZConsequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situationsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4b875010-0f8d-4028-a3ab-f073075426f1EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Gresch, DBoettcher, SEPNobre, ACvan Ede, FIn everyday life, we often anticipate the timing of an upcoming task or event while actively engaging in another. Here, we investigated the effects of predictable temporal structure within such a multi-task scenario. In a visual working-memory task, we manipulated whether the onset of a working-memory probe could be predicted in time, while also embedding a simple intervening task within the delay period. We first show that working-memory performance benefitted from temporal expectations, even though an intervening task had to be completed in the interim. Moreover, temporal predictions regarding the upcoming working-memory probe additionally affected performance on the intervening task, resulting in faster responses when the memory probe was expected early, and slower responses when the memory probe was expected late, as compared to when it was temporally unpredictable. Because the intervening task always occurred at the same time during the memory delay, differences in performance on this intervening task result from a between-task consequence of temporal expectation. Thus, we show that within multi-task settings, knowing when working-memory contents will be required for an upcoming task not only facilitates performance of the associated working-memory task, but can also influence the performance of other, intervening tasks. |
| spellingShingle | Gresch, D Boettcher, SEP Nobre, AC van Ede, F Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title | Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title_full | Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title_fullStr | Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title_short | Consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi-task situations |
| title_sort | consequences of predictable temporal structure in multi task situations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT greschd consequencesofpredictabletemporalstructureinmultitasksituations AT boettchersep consequencesofpredictabletemporalstructureinmultitasksituations AT nobreac consequencesofpredictabletemporalstructureinmultitasksituations AT vanedef consequencesofpredictabletemporalstructureinmultitasksituations |