Predictive decision-making during exploration and social interaction in frontal cortex

<p>In this thesis, I investigated computational and neural mechanisms underlying adaptive decision-making in social and non-social contexts. I focused on the exploration/ exploitation dilemma, during which one has to choose between exploiting the familiar option with relatively known value or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trudel, N
Other Authors: Wittmann, M
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Description
Summary:<p>In this thesis, I investigated computational and neural mechanisms underlying adaptive decision-making in social and non-social contexts. I focused on the exploration/ exploitation dilemma, during which one has to choose between exploiting the familiar option with relatively known value or exploring the option with relatively uncertain value which might lead to a better outcome in the future (reviewed in Chapter 1). Switching between exploration and exploitation was dependent on external factors such as the number of future choice opportunities (i.e. time horizon) and internal factors such as the belief estimates about the accuracy of a predictor (‘accuracy’) and the subjective uncertainty in the accuracy estimate (‘uncertainty’) (Chapter 2). I used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neural correlates of accuracy, uncertainty and their modulation during exploration and exploitation (Chapter 3). Medial and lateral frontal areas were active during exploratory decisions, while ventromedial prefrontal cortex had a unique role in representing multiple decision variables depending on the current behavioural mode. Tracking one’s beliefs is not only important when selecting between predictors, but also when evaluating one’s confidence in the predictor. When we estimate our confidence we take into account the identity of the predictor -- whether it is another social agent or a non-social stimulus that provides information, as well as the experience that we have with the agent or stimulus; people expressed more confidence for social compared to nonsocial predictors. The difference between social and non-social confidence judgments covaried with activity in right posterior temporoparietal junction (Chapter 4). Not only are the estimates we form shaped by the social or non-social identity of the predictors; in addition, whether we learn through direct experience of another person’s actions or vicarious observation of such actions influences how loyal or opportunistic we estimate these other people to be (Chapter 5).</p>