Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the proportion of healthcare interventions tested within Cochrane Reviews that are effective according to high-quality evidence.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected a random sample of 2,42...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Howick, J, Koletsi, D, Ioannidis, JPA, Madigan, C, Pandis, N, Loef, M, Walach, H, Sauer, S, Kleijnen, J, Seehra, J, Johnson, T, Schmidt, S
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2022

Similar Items

Quality of life in cancer patients treated with mistletoe: a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Martin Loef, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Survival of Cancer Patients Treated with Non-Fermented Mistletoe Extract: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Martin Loef, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
by: Geddes, J
Published: (1996)

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions /
by: Higgins, Julian, et al.
Published: (2008)

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
by: Michele Tarsilla
Published: (2010-08-01)

Cochrane reviews will be in Medline.
by: Clarke, M, et al.
Published: (1999)

Blinded by PRISMA: are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines?
by: Padhraig S Fleming, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

Cochrane corner: antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites (intervention review).
by: Henton, J, et al.
Published: (2012)

Cochrane corner: antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites (intervention review).
by: Henton, J, et al.
Published: (2012)

Interventions for smoking cessation: An overview of Cochrane reviews
by: Chun-li Lu, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Turner, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Nikolaos Pandis, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Prevalence of Bruxism in alcohol abusers: a systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
by: Vincenzo Ronsivalle, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
by: Mikkel Zola Andersen, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols.
by: Pandis, N, et al.
Published: (2016)

What is a Cochrane review?
by: Cipriani, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews.
by: Clarke, M
Published: (2007)

Efficacy of interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2012 reviews.
by: Hartmann-Boyce, J, et al.
Published: (2013)

Efficacy of interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2013 reviews.
by: Hartmann-Boyce, J, et al.
Published: (2014)

Consideration of sex and gender in Cochrane reviews of interventions for preventing healthcare-associated infections: a methodology study
by: Jesús López-Alcalde, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Evidence according to Cochrane Systematic Reviews on Alterable Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery
by: Bradley Wallace, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Effects of interventions to combat tobacco addiction: Cochrane update of 2019 and 2020 reviews
by: Livingstone-Banks, J, et al.
Published: (2021)

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
by: Liberati, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
by: Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)

REVIEWS OF QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE: A NEW MILESTONE FOR COCHRANE
by: Guelmezoglu, A, et al.
Published: (2013)

Dental implant survival in epidermolysis bullosa patients: A systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
by: Giuseppe Minervini, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

From meta‐analysis to Cochrane reviews
by: Nicole Ebner, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Physical activity interventions and chronic diseases: A matched-pair analysis comparing Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Hacke, C, et al.
Published: (2017)

Conducting umbrella reviews
by: Belbasis, L, et al.
Published: (2022)

The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library.
by: Clarke, M
Published: (2007)

The Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Scholten, R, et al.
Published: (2005)

Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies
by: Yaffe, J, et al.
Published: (2012)

CONSERVATIVE INTERVENTIONS FOR MANAGING URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATE SURGERY: A COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
by: E Johnson, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)

Pharmacological treatment for psychotic depression: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Wijkstra, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
by: Florence de Lucca Melo, et al.

Neuraminidase inhibitors: the story behind the Cochrane review
by: Doshi, Peter
Published: (2009)

Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.
by: Wiffen, P, et al.
Published: (2017)

Cochrane review of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
by: Butler, A, et al.
Published: (2023)

Impact of clear aligner therapy on masticatory musculature and stomatognathic system: a systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
by: Sultan Abdulrahman Almalki, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)