Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation

This article argues that sociologically informed studies of revolution tend to underestimate the importance of counter-revolution and ‘reaction’ in generating radicalisation. Revolutions are inherently political. Most accounts recognise this, but emphasise the executive organs of state – such as mon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mulholland, M
Format: Journal article
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1826271589031739392
author Mulholland, M
author_facet Mulholland, M
author_sort Mulholland, M
collection OXFORD
description This article argues that sociologically informed studies of revolution tend to underestimate the importance of counter-revolution and ‘reaction’ in generating radicalisation. Revolutions are inherently political. Most accounts recognise this, but emphasise the executive organs of state – such as monarch, cabinet or ministers – at the expense of the intermediary ‘technicians of power’. Revolutions, however, typically seek to refashion an entire technocracy of power, and in so doing struggle against embedded and powerful sites of reaction. Central to the dynamic of revolution is the ‘purge’ of the technocracy of power. As governing structures are not easily transformed at a stroke, revolutions may be seen as punctuating long processes of struggle. Historically, the governing apparatus has been most effectively revolutionised under conditions of military occupation. The thesis is illustrated here by a narrative of revolution in Europe from the English Civil War to the Liberation of the 1940s, with a coda on ’68.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:59:01Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4df4f6d1-c8c6-442b-9437-fe05819e3fc5
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:59:01Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4df4f6d1-c8c6-442b-9437-fe05819e3fc52022-03-26T15:58:20ZRevolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4df4f6d1-c8c6-442b-9437-fe05819e3fc5Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Mulholland, MThis article argues that sociologically informed studies of revolution tend to underestimate the importance of counter-revolution and ‘reaction’ in generating radicalisation. Revolutions are inherently political. Most accounts recognise this, but emphasise the executive organs of state – such as monarch, cabinet or ministers – at the expense of the intermediary ‘technicians of power’. Revolutions, however, typically seek to refashion an entire technocracy of power, and in so doing struggle against embedded and powerful sites of reaction. Central to the dynamic of revolution is the ‘purge’ of the technocracy of power. As governing structures are not easily transformed at a stroke, revolutions may be seen as punctuating long processes of struggle. Historically, the governing apparatus has been most effectively revolutionised under conditions of military occupation. The thesis is illustrated here by a narrative of revolution in Europe from the English Civil War to the Liberation of the 1940s, with a coda on ’68.
spellingShingle Mulholland, M
Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title_full Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title_fullStr Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title_full_unstemmed Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title_short Revolution and the whip of reaction: technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
title_sort revolution and the whip of reaction technicians of power and the dialectic of radicalisation
work_keys_str_mv AT mulhollandm revolutionandthewhipofreactiontechniciansofpowerandthedialecticofradicalisation