Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.

The Oxford knee score (OKS) is a validated and widely accepted disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure, but there is limited evidence regarding any long-term trends in the score. We reviewed 5600 individual OKS questionnaires (1547 patients) from a prospectively-collected knee replacement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Williams, D, Blakey, C, Hadfield, S, Murray, D, Price, A, Field, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2013
_version_ 1797067706068893696
author Williams, D
Blakey, C
Hadfield, S
Murray, D
Price, A
Field, R
author_facet Williams, D
Blakey, C
Hadfield, S
Murray, D
Price, A
Field, R
author_sort Williams, D
collection OXFORD
description The Oxford knee score (OKS) is a validated and widely accepted disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure, but there is limited evidence regarding any long-term trends in the score. We reviewed 5600 individual OKS questionnaires (1547 patients) from a prospectively-collected knee replacement database, to determine the trends in OKS over a ten-year period following total knee replacement. The mean OKS pre-operatively was 19.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.8 to 20.2). The maximum post-operative OKS was observed at two years (mean score 34.4 (95% CI 33.7 to 35.2)), following which a gradual but significant decline was observed through to the ten-year assessment (mean score 30.1 (95% CI 29.1 to 31.1)) (p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for most of the individual OKS components (p < 0.001). Kneeling ability initially improved in the first year but was then followed by rapid deterioration (p < 0.001). Pain severity exhibited the greatest improvement, although residual pain was reported in over two-thirds of patients post-operatively, and peak improvement in the night pain component did not occur until year four. Post-operative OKS was lower for women (p < 0.001), those aged < 60 years (p < 0.003) and those with a body mass index > 35 kg/m(2) (p < 0.014), although similar changes in scores were observed. This information may assist surgeons in advising patients of their expected outcomes, as well as providing a comparative benchmark for evaluating longer-term outcomes following knee replacement.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:00:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4e4b1cb2-e2fa-43b7-acba-ef51d78a0599
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:00:08Z
publishDate 2013
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4e4b1cb2-e2fa-43b7-acba-ef51d78a05992022-03-26T16:00:22ZLong-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4e4b1cb2-e2fa-43b7-acba-ef51d78a0599EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Williams, DBlakey, CHadfield, SMurray, DPrice, AField, RThe Oxford knee score (OKS) is a validated and widely accepted disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure, but there is limited evidence regarding any long-term trends in the score. We reviewed 5600 individual OKS questionnaires (1547 patients) from a prospectively-collected knee replacement database, to determine the trends in OKS over a ten-year period following total knee replacement. The mean OKS pre-operatively was 19.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.8 to 20.2). The maximum post-operative OKS was observed at two years (mean score 34.4 (95% CI 33.7 to 35.2)), following which a gradual but significant decline was observed through to the ten-year assessment (mean score 30.1 (95% CI 29.1 to 31.1)) (p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for most of the individual OKS components (p < 0.001). Kneeling ability initially improved in the first year but was then followed by rapid deterioration (p < 0.001). Pain severity exhibited the greatest improvement, although residual pain was reported in over two-thirds of patients post-operatively, and peak improvement in the night pain component did not occur until year four. Post-operative OKS was lower for women (p < 0.001), those aged < 60 years (p < 0.003) and those with a body mass index > 35 kg/m(2) (p < 0.014), although similar changes in scores were observed. This information may assist surgeons in advising patients of their expected outcomes, as well as providing a comparative benchmark for evaluating longer-term outcomes following knee replacement.
spellingShingle Williams, D
Blakey, C
Hadfield, S
Murray, D
Price, A
Field, R
Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title_full Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title_fullStr Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title_full_unstemmed Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title_short Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement.
title_sort long term trends in the oxford knee score following total knee replacement
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsd longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement
AT blakeyc longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement
AT hadfields longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement
AT murrayd longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement
AT pricea longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement
AT fieldr longtermtrendsintheoxfordkneescorefollowingtotalkneereplacement