Competition in the Water Industry.

The paper discusses competition in the water industry in the UK, with the focus on product-market competition. Water has traditionally been seen as an industry characterized by regional or local natural monopoly, with franchising and contracting out, yardstick competition, and capital market competi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cowan, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1997
_version_ 1797067773682122752
author Cowan, S
author_facet Cowan, S
author_sort Cowan, S
collection OXFORD
description The paper discusses competition in the water industry in the UK, with the focus on product-market competition. Water has traditionally been seen as an industry characterized by regional or local natural monopoly, with franchising and contracting out, yardstick competition, and capital market competition being feasible, but not direct competition. Policy proposals for (i) inset appointments, (ii) common carriage, and (iii) cross-border competition are assessed. The effect of potential competition from inset appointments has been the introduction of quantity discounts for large users. In practice, the threat of competition is likely to make tariffs more cost-reflective, and there will probably be little effect on average tariff levels.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:01:08Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4e9ee25b-621c-40a1-81c1-62941ab39f34
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:01:08Z
publishDate 1997
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4e9ee25b-621c-40a1-81c1-62941ab39f342022-03-26T16:02:14ZCompetition in the Water Industry.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4e9ee25b-621c-40a1-81c1-62941ab39f34EnglishDepartment of Economics - ePrints1997Cowan, SThe paper discusses competition in the water industry in the UK, with the focus on product-market competition. Water has traditionally been seen as an industry characterized by regional or local natural monopoly, with franchising and contracting out, yardstick competition, and capital market competition being feasible, but not direct competition. Policy proposals for (i) inset appointments, (ii) common carriage, and (iii) cross-border competition are assessed. The effect of potential competition from inset appointments has been the introduction of quantity discounts for large users. In practice, the threat of competition is likely to make tariffs more cost-reflective, and there will probably be little effect on average tariff levels.
spellingShingle Cowan, S
Competition in the Water Industry.
title Competition in the Water Industry.
title_full Competition in the Water Industry.
title_fullStr Competition in the Water Industry.
title_full_unstemmed Competition in the Water Industry.
title_short Competition in the Water Industry.
title_sort competition in the water industry
work_keys_str_mv AT cowans competitioninthewaterindustry