Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking
The ability to create lasting, trust-based friendships makes it possible for humans to form large and coherent groups. The recent literature on the evolution of sociality and on the network dynamics of human societies suggests that large human groups have a layered structure generated by emotionally...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
| _version_ | 1826271742504468480 |
|---|---|
| author | David-Barrett, T Rotkirch, A Carney, J Behncke Izquierdo, I Krems, J Townley, D McDaniell, E Byrne-Smith, A Dunbar, R |
| author_facet | David-Barrett, T Rotkirch, A Carney, J Behncke Izquierdo, I Krems, J Townley, D McDaniell, E Byrne-Smith, A Dunbar, R |
| author_sort | David-Barrett, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The ability to create lasting, trust-based friendships makes it possible for humans to form large and coherent groups. The recent literature on the evolution of sociality and on the network dynamics of human societies suggests that large human groups have a layered structure generated by emotionally supported social relationships. There are also gender differences in adult social style which may involve different trade-offs between the quantity and quality of friendships. Although many have suggested that females tend to focus on intimate relations with a few other females, while males build larger, more hierarchical coalitions, the existence of such gender differences is disputed and data from adults is scarce. Here, we present cross-cultural evidence for gender differences in the preference for close friendships. We use a sample of ∼112,000 profile pictures from nine world regions posted on a popular social networking site to show that, in self-selected displays of social relationships, women favour dyadic relations, whereas men favour larger, all-male cliques. These apparently different solutions to quality-quantity trade-offs suggest a universal and fundamental difference in the function of close friendships for the two sexes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:01:29Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:4ec01a94-90b3-4b98-a8e4-9623a7c4ef8a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:01:29Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:4ec01a94-90b3-4b98-a8e4-9623a7c4ef8a2022-03-26T16:02:58ZWomen favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networkingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4ec01a94-90b3-4b98-a8e4-9623a7c4ef8aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2015David-Barrett, TRotkirch, ACarney, JBehncke Izquierdo, IKrems, JTownley, DMcDaniell, EByrne-Smith, ADunbar, RThe ability to create lasting, trust-based friendships makes it possible for humans to form large and coherent groups. The recent literature on the evolution of sociality and on the network dynamics of human societies suggests that large human groups have a layered structure generated by emotionally supported social relationships. There are also gender differences in adult social style which may involve different trade-offs between the quantity and quality of friendships. Although many have suggested that females tend to focus on intimate relations with a few other females, while males build larger, more hierarchical coalitions, the existence of such gender differences is disputed and data from adults is scarce. Here, we present cross-cultural evidence for gender differences in the preference for close friendships. We use a sample of ∼112,000 profile pictures from nine world regions posted on a popular social networking site to show that, in self-selected displays of social relationships, women favour dyadic relations, whereas men favour larger, all-male cliques. These apparently different solutions to quality-quantity trade-offs suggest a universal and fundamental difference in the function of close friendships for the two sexes. |
| spellingShingle | David-Barrett, T Rotkirch, A Carney, J Behncke Izquierdo, I Krems, J Townley, D McDaniell, E Byrne-Smith, A Dunbar, R Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title | Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title_full | Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title_fullStr | Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title_full_unstemmed | Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title_short | Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: cross-cultural evidence from social networking |
| title_sort | women favour dyadic relationships but men prefer clubs cross cultural evidence from social networking |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidbarrettt womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT rotkircha womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT carneyj womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT behnckeizquierdoi womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT kremsj womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT townleyd womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT mcdanielle womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT byrnesmitha womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking AT dunbarr womenfavourdyadicrelationshipsbutmenpreferclubscrossculturalevidencefromsocialnetworking |