Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, from a health provider and patient perspective, surgical stabilisation of the spine is cost effective when compared with an intensive programme of rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomised con...
Main Authors: | Rivero-Arias, O, Campbell, H, Gray, A, Fairbank, J, Frost, H, Wilson-MacDonald, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2005
|
Similar Items
-
Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial.
by: Fairbank, J, et al.
Published: (2005) -
A UK multi-centre trial-based cost-utility analysis of surgical stabilisation of the spine versus intensive rehabilitation for treatment of chronic low back pain patients
by: Rivero-Arias, O, et al.
Published: (2003) -
Responsiveness of the shuttle walking test compared with disease specific and generic outcome measures in patients with chronic back pain
by: Rivero-Arias, O, et al.
Published: (2004) -
Responsiveness of objective, disease-specific, and generic outcome measures in patients with chronic low back pain: an assessment for improving, stable, and deteriorating patients.
by: Campbell, H, et al.
Published: (2006) -
The MRC spine stabilization trial: surgical methods, outcomes, costs, and complications of surgical stabilization.
by: Wilson-MacDonald, J, et al.
Published: (2008)