Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
Heterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Pl...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2005
|
_version_ | 1826271829752283136 |
---|---|
author | Vuola, J Keating, S Webster, D Berthoud, T Dunachie, S Gilbert, S Hill, A |
author_facet | Vuola, J Keating, S Webster, D Berthoud, T Dunachie, S Gilbert, S Hill, A |
author_sort | Vuola, J |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Heterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans. In this study, we characterize, using two types of ELISPOT assays and FACS analysis, cell-mediated immune responses induced by different prime-boost combinations where all vectors encode a multiepitope string fused to the pre-erythrocytic Ag thrombospondin-related adhesion protein. We show that these different vectors need to be used in a specific order for an optimal ex vivo IFN-gamma response. From the different combinations, DNA priming followed by MVA boosting and FP9 priming followed by MVA boosting were most immunogenic and in both cases the IFN-gamma response was of broad specificity and cross-reactive against two P. falciparum strains (3D7 and T9/96). Immunization with all three vectors showed no improvement over optimal two vector regimes. Strong ex vivo IFN-gamma responses peaked 1 wk after the booster dose, but cultured ELISPOT assays revealed longer-lasting T cell memory responses for at least 6 mo. In the DNA-primed vaccinees the IFN-gamma response was mainly due to CD4(+) T cells, whereas in the FP9-primed vaccinees it was mainly due to CD4-dependent CD8(+) T cells. This difference may be of importance for the protective efficacy of these vaccination approaches against various diseases. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:02:54Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da5288448 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:02:54Z |
publishDate | 2005 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da52884482022-03-26T16:05:43ZDifferential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da5288448EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005Vuola, JKeating, SWebster, DBerthoud, TDunachie, SGilbert, SHill, AHeterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans. In this study, we characterize, using two types of ELISPOT assays and FACS analysis, cell-mediated immune responses induced by different prime-boost combinations where all vectors encode a multiepitope string fused to the pre-erythrocytic Ag thrombospondin-related adhesion protein. We show that these different vectors need to be used in a specific order for an optimal ex vivo IFN-gamma response. From the different combinations, DNA priming followed by MVA boosting and FP9 priming followed by MVA boosting were most immunogenic and in both cases the IFN-gamma response was of broad specificity and cross-reactive against two P. falciparum strains (3D7 and T9/96). Immunization with all three vectors showed no improvement over optimal two vector regimes. Strong ex vivo IFN-gamma responses peaked 1 wk after the booster dose, but cultured ELISPOT assays revealed longer-lasting T cell memory responses for at least 6 mo. In the DNA-primed vaccinees the IFN-gamma response was mainly due to CD4(+) T cells, whereas in the FP9-primed vaccinees it was mainly due to CD4-dependent CD8(+) T cells. This difference may be of importance for the protective efficacy of these vaccination approaches against various diseases. |
spellingShingle | Vuola, J Keating, S Webster, D Berthoud, T Dunachie, S Gilbert, S Hill, A Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title | Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title_full | Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title_fullStr | Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title_short | Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers. |
title_sort | differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime boost vaccine regimens using dna and viral vectors in healthy volunteers |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vuolaj differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT keatings differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT websterd differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT berthoudt differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT dunachies differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT gilberts differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers AT hilla differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers |