Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.

Heterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vuola, J, Keating, S, Webster, D, Berthoud, T, Dunachie, S, Gilbert, S, Hill, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2005
_version_ 1826271829752283136
author Vuola, J
Keating, S
Webster, D
Berthoud, T
Dunachie, S
Gilbert, S
Hill, A
author_facet Vuola, J
Keating, S
Webster, D
Berthoud, T
Dunachie, S
Gilbert, S
Hill, A
author_sort Vuola, J
collection OXFORD
description Heterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans. In this study, we characterize, using two types of ELISPOT assays and FACS analysis, cell-mediated immune responses induced by different prime-boost combinations where all vectors encode a multiepitope string fused to the pre-erythrocytic Ag thrombospondin-related adhesion protein. We show that these different vectors need to be used in a specific order for an optimal ex vivo IFN-gamma response. From the different combinations, DNA priming followed by MVA boosting and FP9 priming followed by MVA boosting were most immunogenic and in both cases the IFN-gamma response was of broad specificity and cross-reactive against two P. falciparum strains (3D7 and T9/96). Immunization with all three vectors showed no improvement over optimal two vector regimes. Strong ex vivo IFN-gamma responses peaked 1 wk after the booster dose, but cultured ELISPOT assays revealed longer-lasting T cell memory responses for at least 6 mo. In the DNA-primed vaccinees the IFN-gamma response was mainly due to CD4(+) T cells, whereas in the FP9-primed vaccinees it was mainly due to CD4-dependent CD8(+) T cells. This difference may be of importance for the protective efficacy of these vaccination approaches against various diseases.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:02:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da5288448
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:02:54Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da52884482022-03-26T16:05:43ZDifferential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4f3331be-785a-420a-90e1-664da5288448EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005Vuola, JKeating, SWebster, DBerthoud, TDunachie, SGilbert, SHill, AHeterologous prime-boost vaccination has been shown to be an efficient way of inducing T cell responses in animals and in humans. We have used three vaccine vectors, naked DNA, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), and attenuated fowlpox strain, FP9, for prime-boost vaccination approaches against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in humans. In this study, we characterize, using two types of ELISPOT assays and FACS analysis, cell-mediated immune responses induced by different prime-boost combinations where all vectors encode a multiepitope string fused to the pre-erythrocytic Ag thrombospondin-related adhesion protein. We show that these different vectors need to be used in a specific order for an optimal ex vivo IFN-gamma response. From the different combinations, DNA priming followed by MVA boosting and FP9 priming followed by MVA boosting were most immunogenic and in both cases the IFN-gamma response was of broad specificity and cross-reactive against two P. falciparum strains (3D7 and T9/96). Immunization with all three vectors showed no improvement over optimal two vector regimes. Strong ex vivo IFN-gamma responses peaked 1 wk after the booster dose, but cultured ELISPOT assays revealed longer-lasting T cell memory responses for at least 6 mo. In the DNA-primed vaccinees the IFN-gamma response was mainly due to CD4(+) T cells, whereas in the FP9-primed vaccinees it was mainly due to CD4-dependent CD8(+) T cells. This difference may be of importance for the protective efficacy of these vaccination approaches against various diseases.
spellingShingle Vuola, J
Keating, S
Webster, D
Berthoud, T
Dunachie, S
Gilbert, S
Hill, A
Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title_full Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title_fullStr Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title_full_unstemmed Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title_short Differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimens using DNA and viral vectors in healthy volunteers.
title_sort differential immunogenicity of various heterologous prime boost vaccine regimens using dna and viral vectors in healthy volunteers
work_keys_str_mv AT vuolaj differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT keatings differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT websterd differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT berthoudt differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT dunachies differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT gilberts differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers
AT hilla differentialimmunogenicityofvariousheterologousprimeboostvaccineregimensusingdnaandviralvectorsinhealthyvolunteers