Rationing in an era of multiple tight constraints: is cost-utility analysis still fit for purpose?
Cost-utility analysis may not be sufficient to support reimbursement decisions when the assessed health intervention requires a large proportion of the healthcare budget or when the monetary healthcare budget is not the only resource constraint. Such cases include joint replacement, COVID-19 interve...
Main Authors: | Dakin, HA, Tsiachristas, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2024
|
Similar Items
-
Rationing in an era of multiple tights constraints: is cost-utility analysis still fit for purpose?
by: Dakin, H, et al.
Published: (2022) -
EU Transparency as ‘Documents’: Still Fit for Purpose?
by: Maarten Hillebrandt
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Fit for Purpose?
by: David Rae
Published: (2004-10-01) -
Genes and sepsis: how tight is the fit?
by: Gordon, A, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Almost tight rational coefficients biorthogonal wavelet filters
by: Tay, David B. H., et al.
Published: (2020)