Rationing in an era of multiple tight constraints: is cost-utility analysis still fit for purpose?
Cost-utility analysis may not be sufficient to support reimbursement decisions when the assessed health intervention requires a large proportion of the healthcare budget or when the monetary healthcare budget is not the only resource constraint. Such cases include joint replacement, COVID-19 interve...
Päätekijät: | Dakin, HA, Tsiachristas, A |
---|---|
Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
Kieli: | English |
Julkaistu: |
Springer
2024
|
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
Rationing in an era of multiple tights constraints: is cost-utility analysis still fit for purpose?
Tekijä: Dakin, H, et al.
Julkaistu: (2022) -
EU Transparency as ‘Documents’: Still Fit for Purpose?
Tekijä: Maarten Hillebrandt
Julkaistu: (2021-03-01) -
Fit for Purpose?
Tekijä: David Rae
Julkaistu: (2004-10-01) -
Genes and sepsis: how tight is the fit?
Tekijä: Gordon, A, et al.
Julkaistu: (2008) -
Almost tight rational coefficients biorthogonal wavelet filters
Tekijä: Tay, David B. H., et al.
Julkaistu: (2020)