Addressing patient treatment preferences at trial recruitment.

Addressing patient treatment preferences at trial recruitment.

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Mills, N, Wade, J, Lane, A, Hamdy, F, Neal, D, Donovan, J
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2011

Similar Items

Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2011)

Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Factors associated with trial recruitment, preferences, and treatments received were elucidated in a comprehensive cohort study.
by: Donovan, JL, et al.
Published: (2019)

Ethics of clinical trials from bayesian perspective: randomisation to clinical trials may solve dilemma of treatment choice in prostate cancer.
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2003)

The protect trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer and associated molecular and genetic epidemiology studies
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

THE PROTECT TRIAL - EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENTS FOR CLINICALLY LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

The ProtecT trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer (ISRCTN20141297)
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials.
by: Wade, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

Prostate cancer detection in men aged 45-49 years in the UK protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) trial
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Understanding and improving recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Qualitative research approaches.
by: Elliott, D, et al.
Published: (2017)

Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2010)

A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study).
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2006)

Media and internet impact on randomisation rates and treatment acceptability in the protect study
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2008)

Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2003)

The protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Advanced cases found through a UK screening study
by: Neal, D, et al.
Published: (2006)

The protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Evaluating screening and treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer in the UK
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Patient-reported outcomes following treatment for localized prostate cancer: Helping decision making for patients and their physicians.
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2017)

The effect of optimised patient information materials on recruitment in a lung cancer screening trial: an embedded randomised recruitment trial
by: Parker, A, et al.
Published: (2018)

Decision-making about PSA testing and prostate biopsies: a qualitative study embedded in a primary care randomised trial.
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2008)

MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER MAKE POSITIVE DIETARY CHANGES FOLLOWING TREATMENT IN A RANDOMISED TRIAL: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
by: Avery, K, et al.
Published: (2012)

A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance.
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

A Peer Review Intervention for Monitoring and Evaluating sites (PRIME) that improved randomized controlled trial conduct and performance
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Strategies to address changing audience preferences
by: Mytton, Graham L.
Published: (2008)

The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention supported five randomized trials to recruit to target: a mixed-methods evaluation
by: Rooshenas, L, et al.
Published: (2018)

Conveying equipoise during recruitment for clinical trials: Qualitative synthesis of clinicians' practices across six randomised controlled trials.
by: Rooshenas, L, et al.
Published: (2016)

Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review.
by: Bryant, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

Guidelines for reporting embedded recruitment trials
by: Madurasinghe, V, et al.
Published: (2016)

Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial.
by: Canvin, K, et al.
Published: (2006)

Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.
by: Lane, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

Low risk research using routinely collected identifiable health information without informed consent: encounters with the Patient Information Advisory Group.
by: Metcalfe, C, et al.
Published: (2008)

Factors distinguishing general practitioners who more readily participated in a large randomized trial were identified.
by: Down, L, et al.
Published: (2009)

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials
by: Treweek, S, et al.
Published: (2018)

Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: systematic review and qualitative study.
by: Raftery, J, et al.
Published: (2008)

PIRRIST: Patient and public involvement (PPI) to enhance recruitment and retention in surgical trials
by: Crocker, JC, et al.
Published: (2019)

Facilitating trial recruitment: A qualitative study of patient and staff experiences of an orthopaedic trauma trial
by: Phelps, E, et al.
Published: (2019)

Characteristics of men responding to an invitation to undergo testing for prostate cancer as part of a randomised trial.
by: Walsh, E, et al.
Published: (2016)

The microbiome of infants recruited to a randomised placebo-controlled probiotic trial (PiPS Trial)
by: Millar, M, et al.
Published: (2017)

An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: An embedded randomised recruitment trial
by: Cockayne, S, et al.
Published: (2017)

Recruitment to publicly funded trials--are surgical trials really different?
by: Cook, J, et al.
Published: (2008)