A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages
An unresolved question is how HIV‐1 achieves efficient replication in terminally differentiated macrophages despite the restriction factor SAMHD1. We reveal inducible changes in expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins including MCM2 and cyclins A, E, D1/D3 in macrophages, without evidence for D...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EMBO Press
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826314909486415872 |
|---|---|
| author | Mlcochova, P Sutherland, KA Watters, SA Bertoli, C de Bruin, RA Rehwinkel, J Neil, SJ Lenzi, GM Kim, B Khwaja, A Gage, MC Georgiou, C Chittka, A Yona, S Noursadeghi, M Towers, GJ Gupta, RK |
| author_facet | Mlcochova, P Sutherland, KA Watters, SA Bertoli, C de Bruin, RA Rehwinkel, J Neil, SJ Lenzi, GM Kim, B Khwaja, A Gage, MC Georgiou, C Chittka, A Yona, S Noursadeghi, M Towers, GJ Gupta, RK |
| author_sort | Mlcochova, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | An unresolved question is how HIV‐1 achieves efficient replication in terminally differentiated macrophages despite the restriction factor SAMHD1. We reveal inducible changes in expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins including MCM2 and cyclins A, E, D1/D3 in macrophages, without evidence for DNA synthesis or mitosis. These changes are induced by activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade, culminating in upregulation of CDK1 with subsequent SAMHD1 T592 phosphorylation and deactivation of its antiviral activity. HIV infection is limited to these G1‐like phase macrophages at the single‐cell level. Depletion of SAMHD1 in macrophages decouples the association between infection and expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins, with terminally differentiated macrophages becoming highly susceptible to HIV‐1. We observe both embryo‐derived and monocyte‐derived tissue‐resident macrophages in a G1‐like phase at frequencies approaching 20%, suggesting how macrophages sustain HIV‐1 replication in vivo. Finally, we reveal a SAMHD1‐dependent antiretroviral activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors acting via p53 activation. These data provide a basis for host‐directed therapeutic approaches aimed at limiting HIV‐1 burden in macrophages that may contribute to curative interventions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:16:09Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:506e7606-3e1d-411e-9d4a-6b678555a1a0 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-09T03:16:09Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | EMBO Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:506e7606-3e1d-411e-9d4a-6b678555a1a02024-10-18T20:10:50ZA G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophagesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:506e7606-3e1d-411e-9d4a-6b678555a1a0EnglishJisc Publications RouterEMBO Press2017Mlcochova, PSutherland, KAWatters, SABertoli, Cde Bruin, RARehwinkel, JNeil, SJLenzi, GMKim, BKhwaja, AGage, MCGeorgiou, CChittka, AYona, SNoursadeghi, MTowers, GJGupta, RKAn unresolved question is how HIV‐1 achieves efficient replication in terminally differentiated macrophages despite the restriction factor SAMHD1. We reveal inducible changes in expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins including MCM2 and cyclins A, E, D1/D3 in macrophages, without evidence for DNA synthesis or mitosis. These changes are induced by activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade, culminating in upregulation of CDK1 with subsequent SAMHD1 T592 phosphorylation and deactivation of its antiviral activity. HIV infection is limited to these G1‐like phase macrophages at the single‐cell level. Depletion of SAMHD1 in macrophages decouples the association between infection and expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins, with terminally differentiated macrophages becoming highly susceptible to HIV‐1. We observe both embryo‐derived and monocyte‐derived tissue‐resident macrophages in a G1‐like phase at frequencies approaching 20%, suggesting how macrophages sustain HIV‐1 replication in vivo. Finally, we reveal a SAMHD1‐dependent antiretroviral activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors acting via p53 activation. These data provide a basis for host‐directed therapeutic approaches aimed at limiting HIV‐1 burden in macrophages that may contribute to curative interventions. |
| spellingShingle | Mlcochova, P Sutherland, KA Watters, SA Bertoli, C de Bruin, RA Rehwinkel, J Neil, SJ Lenzi, GM Kim, B Khwaja, A Gage, MC Georgiou, C Chittka, A Yona, S Noursadeghi, M Towers, GJ Gupta, RK A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title | A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title_full | A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title_fullStr | A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title_full_unstemmed | A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title_short | A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages |
| title_sort | g1 like state allows hiv 1 to bypass samhd1 restriction in macrophages |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mlcochovap ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT sutherlandka ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT watterssa ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT bertolic ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT debruinra ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT rehwinkelj ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT neilsj ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT lenzigm ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT kimb ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT khwajaa ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT gagemc ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT georgiouc ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT chittkaa ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT yonas ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT noursadeghim ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT towersgj ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT guptark ag1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT mlcochovap g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT sutherlandka g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT watterssa g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT bertolic g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT debruinra g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT rehwinkelj g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT neilsj g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT lenzigm g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT kimb g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT khwajaa g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT gagemc g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT georgiouc g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT chittkaa g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT yonas g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT noursadeghim g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT towersgj g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages AT guptark g1likestateallowshiv1tobypasssamhd1restrictioninmacrophages |