Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.

Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies.

The European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) demonstrated a significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality. The ongoing Comparison Arm for ProtecT (CAP) cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluates prostate cancer screening effectiveness by comparing pri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Lane, J, Hamdy, F, Martin, R, Turner, E, Neal, D, Donovan, J
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	2010

Similar Items

The protecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Evaluating screening and treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer in the UK
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

The ProtecT trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer (ISRCTN20141297)
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2004)

Prostate cancer screening and management: Caution against over-interpreting the results of the latest study, ProtecT
by: Isaac Yi Kim
Published: (2023-07-01)

Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) feasibility study
by: J. Donovan, et al.
Published: (2003-01-01)

Associations of adiponectin and leptin with stage and grade of PSA-detected prostate cancer: the ProtecT study.
by: Burton, A, et al.
Published: (2013)

Contribution of a single repeat PSA test to prostate cancer risk assessment: experience from the ProtecT study.
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2008)

Association of obesity with prostate cancer: A case-control study within the population-based PSA testing phase of the ProtecT study
by: Dimitropoulou, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Association of obesity with prostate cancer: a case-control study within the population-based PSA testing phase of the ProtecT study.
by: Dimitropoulou, P, et al.
Published: (2011)

Mortality among nen with advanced prostate cancer excluded from the ProtecT Trial
by: Johnston, T, et al.
Published: (2016)

Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study).
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2003)

Alcohol consumption and PSA-detected prostate cancer risk--a case-control nested in the ProtecT study.
by: Zuccolo, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study.
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2003)

Associations of sexual dysfunction symptoms with PSA-detected localised and advanced prostate cancer: a case-control study nested within the UK population-based ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) study.
by: Collin, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: Prospective evaluation within ProtecT study
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study.
by: Rosario, D, et al.
Published: (2012)

Circulating Metabolic Biomarkers of Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer in the ProtecT Study
by: Adams, Charleen D., et al.
Published: (2018)

Establishing nurse-led active surveillance for men with localised prostate cancer: development and formative evaluation of a model of care in the ProtecT trial
by: Wade, J, et al.
Published: (2015)

A prospective cohort and extended comprehensive-cohort design provided insights about the generalizability of a pragmatic trial: the ProtecT prostate cancer trial
by: Donovan, JL, et al.
Published: (2017)

Post-diagnosis serum insulin-like growth factors in relation to dietary and lifestyle changes in the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) trial.
by: Er, V, et al.
Published: (2017)

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: experience from the ProtecT study.
by: Catto, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Suitability of PSA-detected localised prostate cancers for focal therapy: Experience from the ProtecT study
by: Catto, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study: what have we learnt?
by: Hamdy, F
Published: (2017)

Prostate cancer detection in men aged 45-49 years in the UK protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) trial
by: Hamdy, F, et al.
Published: (2006)

Patient-reported outcomes in the ProtecT randomized trial of clinically localized prostate cancer treatments: study design, and baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function and quality of life.
by: Lane, A, et al.
Published: (2016)

Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active monitoring for men with clinically localised prostate cancer from median 10-year outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial
by: S. Sanghera, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

The protect (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study: Advanced cases found through a UK screening study
by: Neal, D, et al.
Published: (2006)

The ProtecT trial: Analysis of the patient cohort, baseline risk stratification and disease progression
by: Young, GJ, et al.
Published: (2020)

A comparison of socio-demographic and psychological factors between patients consenting to randomisation and those selecting treatment (the ProtecT study).
by: Mills, N, et al.
Published: (2006)

Associations of aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and paracetamol use with PSA-detected prostate cancer: findings from a large, population-based, case-control study (the ProtecT study).
by: Murad, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the protecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received
by: Neal, D, et al.
Published: (2019)

Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: The ProtecT three-arm RCT
by: Hamdy, FC, et al.
Published: (2020)

PTGS2-899G>C and prostate cancer risk: a population-based nested case-control study (ProtecT) and a systematic review with meta-analysis.
by: Murad, A, et al.
Published: (2009)

THE PROTECT TRIAL - EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENTS FOR CLINICALLY LOCALISED PROSTATE CANCER
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2009)

A polymorphism in the glucokinase gene that raises plasma fasting glucose, rs1799884, is associated with diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer: findings from a population-based, case-control study (the ProtecT study).
by: Murad, A, et al.
Published: (2010)

The protect trial - Evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer and associated molecular and genetic epidemiology studies
by: Lane, J, et al.
Published: (2007)

Screening for prostate cancer. The case against.
by: Donovan, J, et al.
Published: (2005)

Measuring the psychosocial impact of population-based prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in the UK.
by: Brindle, L, et al.
Published: (2006)

ASSOCIATIONS OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION WITH LOCALIZED AND ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY NESTED WITHIN THE UK POPULATION-BASED PROTECT (PROSTATE TESTING FOR CANCER AND TREATMENT) STUDY
by: Collin, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Estimating the sensitivity of a prostate cancer screening programme for different PSA cut-off levels: A UK case study
by: Leal, J, et al.
Published: (2018)