The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon!
With the election of President Trump, climate deniers feel emboldened and moved from the fringes to the centre of global policy making. We study how an agnostic approach to policy, based on Pascal's wager and allowing for subjective prior probability beliefs about whether climate deniers are ri...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826272190738202624 |
|---|---|
| author | van Der Ploeg, F Rezai, A |
| author_facet | van Der Ploeg, F Rezai, A |
| author_sort | van Der Ploeg, F |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | With the election of President Trump, climate deniers feel emboldened and moved from the fringes to the centre of global policy making. We study how an agnostic approach to policy, based on Pascal's wager and allowing for subjective prior probability beliefs about whether climate deniers are right, prices carbon. Using the DICE integrated assessment model, we find that assigning a 10% chance of climate deniers being correct lowers the global price on carbon in 2020 only marginally: from $21 to $19 per ton of carbon dioxide if policymakers apply ‘Nordhaus discounting’ and from $91 to $84 per ton of carbon dioxide if they apply ‘Stern discounting’. Agnostics’ reflection of remaining scientific uncertainty leaves climate policy essentially unchanged. The robustness of an ambitious climate policy also follows from using the max-min or the min-max regret principle. Letting the coefficient of relative ambiguity aversion vary from zero, corresponding to expected utility analysis, to infinity, corresponding to the max-min principle, we show how policy makers deal with fundamental climate model uncertainty if they are prepared to assign prior probabilities to different views of the world being correct. Allowing for an ethical discount rate and a higher market discount rate and for a wide range of sensitivity exercises including damage uncertainty, we show that pricing carbon is the robust response under rising climate scepticism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:08:37Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:5108bb4a-71c7-4ac7-b3d1-29d57d056af9 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:08:37Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:5108bb4a-71c7-4ac7-b3d1-29d57d056af92022-03-26T16:17:05ZThe agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon!Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5108bb4a-71c7-4ac7-b3d1-29d57d056af9EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2018van Der Ploeg, FRezai, AWith the election of President Trump, climate deniers feel emboldened and moved from the fringes to the centre of global policy making. We study how an agnostic approach to policy, based on Pascal's wager and allowing for subjective prior probability beliefs about whether climate deniers are right, prices carbon. Using the DICE integrated assessment model, we find that assigning a 10% chance of climate deniers being correct lowers the global price on carbon in 2020 only marginally: from $21 to $19 per ton of carbon dioxide if policymakers apply ‘Nordhaus discounting’ and from $91 to $84 per ton of carbon dioxide if they apply ‘Stern discounting’. Agnostics’ reflection of remaining scientific uncertainty leaves climate policy essentially unchanged. The robustness of an ambitious climate policy also follows from using the max-min or the min-max regret principle. Letting the coefficient of relative ambiguity aversion vary from zero, corresponding to expected utility analysis, to infinity, corresponding to the max-min principle, we show how policy makers deal with fundamental climate model uncertainty if they are prepared to assign prior probabilities to different views of the world being correct. Allowing for an ethical discount rate and a higher market discount rate and for a wide range of sensitivity exercises including damage uncertainty, we show that pricing carbon is the robust response under rising climate scepticism. |
| spellingShingle | van Der Ploeg, F Rezai, A The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title | The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title_full | The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title_fullStr | The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title_full_unstemmed | The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title_short | The agnostic's response to climate deniers: price carbon! |
| title_sort | agnostic s response to climate deniers price carbon |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderploegf theagnosticsresponsetoclimatedenierspricecarbon AT rezaia theagnosticsresponsetoclimatedenierspricecarbon AT vanderploegf agnosticsresponsetoclimatedenierspricecarbon AT rezaia agnosticsresponsetoclimatedenierspricecarbon |