Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies

Human activities are drastically reshaping Earth’s ecosystems. Across the tree of life, species become threatened and ultimately go extinct when they are unable to cope with these changes. Hence, understanding the resilience of natural populations is necessary to understand and predict species’ capa...

תיאור מלא

מידע ביבליוגרפי
Main Authors: Merrien, T, Davis, KJ, Di Marco, M, Capdevila, P, Salguero-Gómez, R
פורמט: Journal article
שפה:English
יצא לאור: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022
_version_ 1826309574204850176
author Merrien, T
Davis, KJ
Di Marco, M
Capdevila, P
Salguero-Gómez, R
author_facet Merrien, T
Davis, KJ
Di Marco, M
Capdevila, P
Salguero-Gómez, R
author_sort Merrien, T
collection OXFORD
description Human activities are drastically reshaping Earth’s ecosystems. Across the tree of life, species become threatened and ultimately go extinct when they are unable to cope with these changes. Hence, understanding the resilience of natural populations is necessary to understand and predict species’ capacity to cope with increasing human pressures. Here, we use high-resolution demographic information for 921 populations of wild plants and animals to assess how they respond to increasing levels of human pressure. We show that fewer successful resilience strategies, allowing population to persist in disturb environments, exist in human-influenced habitats compared to pristine habitats. In contrast, pristine habitats host species with higher resistance and faster recovery than more altered environments. Importantly, the examined macroecologial patterns of demographic resilience are kingdom- and mobility-specific: natural populations of plants recover faster and have a propensity to grow faster after a disturbance (i.e., compensation) in urban areas than in pristine habitats, while these tendencies do not appear in animals. Likewise, populations of animals with limited mobility are less able to resist or compensate for disturbances in human altered environments than highly mobile populations. Our results suggest that human activities have eroded the diversity of natural populations’ resilience strategies. This finding implies that species will be less tolerant to disturbance in the future, as continuing biodiversity loss and increasing human impacts will ultimately shrink the spectrum of resilience strategies of organisms.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:37:49Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:518aa600-549a-4638-ba45-6261341155a1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:37:49Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:518aa600-549a-4638-ba45-6261341155a12023-03-28T16:41:38ZHuman disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategiesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:518aa600-549a-4638-ba45-6261341155a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsCold Spring Harbor Laboratory2022Merrien, TDavis, KJDi Marco, MCapdevila, PSalguero-Gómez, RHuman activities are drastically reshaping Earth’s ecosystems. Across the tree of life, species become threatened and ultimately go extinct when they are unable to cope with these changes. Hence, understanding the resilience of natural populations is necessary to understand and predict species’ capacity to cope with increasing human pressures. Here, we use high-resolution demographic information for 921 populations of wild plants and animals to assess how they respond to increasing levels of human pressure. We show that fewer successful resilience strategies, allowing population to persist in disturb environments, exist in human-influenced habitats compared to pristine habitats. In contrast, pristine habitats host species with higher resistance and faster recovery than more altered environments. Importantly, the examined macroecologial patterns of demographic resilience are kingdom- and mobility-specific: natural populations of plants recover faster and have a propensity to grow faster after a disturbance (i.e., compensation) in urban areas than in pristine habitats, while these tendencies do not appear in animals. Likewise, populations of animals with limited mobility are less able to resist or compensate for disturbances in human altered environments than highly mobile populations. Our results suggest that human activities have eroded the diversity of natural populations’ resilience strategies. This finding implies that species will be less tolerant to disturbance in the future, as continuing biodiversity loss and increasing human impacts will ultimately shrink the spectrum of resilience strategies of organisms.
spellingShingle Merrien, T
Davis, KJ
Di Marco, M
Capdevila, P
Salguero-Gómez, R
Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title_full Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title_fullStr Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title_full_unstemmed Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title_short Human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
title_sort human disturbances erode the diversity of species resilience strategies
work_keys_str_mv AT merrient humandisturbanceserodethediversityofspeciesresiliencestrategies
AT daviskj humandisturbanceserodethediversityofspeciesresiliencestrategies
AT dimarcom humandisturbanceserodethediversityofspeciesresiliencestrategies
AT capdevilap humandisturbanceserodethediversityofspeciesresiliencestrategies
AT salguerogomezr humandisturbanceserodethediversityofspeciesresiliencestrategies