Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance
This report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared usi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference item |
| Published: |
2003
|
| _version_ | 1797068396408340480 |
|---|---|
| author | Drozhdin, A Blair, G Keller, L Kozanecki, W Markiewicz, T Maruyama, T Mokhov, N Napoly, O Raubenheimer, T Schulte, D Seryi, A Tenenbaum, P Walker, N Woodley, M Zimmermann, F |
| author_facet | Drozhdin, A Blair, G Keller, L Kozanecki, W Markiewicz, T Maruyama, T Mokhov, N Napoly, O Raubenheimer, T Schulte, D Seryi, A Tenenbaum, P Walker, N Woodley, M Zimmermann, F |
| author_sort | Drozhdin, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | This report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared using the same computer code under the same assumptions. Their performance is quantified in terms of beam-halo and synchrotron-radiation collimation efficiency. The performance of the current designs varies across projects, and does not always meet the original design goals. But these comparisons suggest that achieving the required performance in a future linear collider is feasible. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:10:11Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:518c0b09-def6-455a-96bb-1968b792372b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:10:11Z |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:518c0b09-def6-455a-96bb-1968b792372b2022-03-26T16:20:12ZComparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performanceConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:518c0b09-def6-455a-96bb-1968b792372bSymplectic Elements at Oxford2003Drozhdin, ABlair, GKeller, LKozanecki, WMarkiewicz, TMaruyama, TMokhov, NNapoly, ORaubenheimer, TSchulte, DSeryi, ATenenbaum, PWalker, NWoodley, MZimmermann, FThis report describes studies performed in the framework of the Collimation Task Force organized to support the work of the second International Linear Collider Technical Review Committee. The post-linac beam-collimation systems in the TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC linear-collider designs are compared using the same computer code under the same assumptions. Their performance is quantified in terms of beam-halo and synchrotron-radiation collimation efficiency. The performance of the current designs varies across projects, and does not always meet the original design goals. But these comparisons suggest that achieving the required performance in a future linear collider is feasible. |
| spellingShingle | Drozhdin, A Blair, G Keller, L Kozanecki, W Markiewicz, T Maruyama, T Mokhov, N Napoly, O Raubenheimer, T Schulte, D Seryi, A Tenenbaum, P Walker, N Woodley, M Zimmermann, F Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title_full | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title_short | Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and CLIC beam-collimation system performance |
| title_sort | comparison of the tesla nlc and clic beam collimation system performance |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT drozhdina comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT blairg comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT kellerl comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT kozaneckiw comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT markiewiczt comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT maruyamat comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT mokhovn comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT napolyo comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT raubenheimert comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT schulted comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT seryia comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT tenenbaump comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT walkern comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT woodleym comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance AT zimmermannf comparisonoftheteslanlcandclicbeamcollimationsystemperformance |