The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence

We describe a form of moral artificial intelligence that could be used to improve human moral decision-making. We call it the “artificial moral advisor” (AMA). The AMA would implement a quasi-relativistic version of the “ideal observer” famously described by Roderick Firth. We describe similarities...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giubilini, A, Savulescu, J
Format: Journal article
Published: Springer Netherlands 2017
_version_ 1826272302388477952
author Giubilini, A
Savulescu, J
author_facet Giubilini, A
Savulescu, J
author_sort Giubilini, A
collection OXFORD
description We describe a form of moral artificial intelligence that could be used to improve human moral decision-making. We call it the “artificial moral advisor” (AMA). The AMA would implement a quasi-relativistic version of the “ideal observer” famously described by Roderick Firth. We describe similarities and differences between the AMA and Firth’s ideal observer. Like Firth’s ideal observer, the AMA is disinterested, dispassionate, and consistent in its judgments. Unlike Firth’s observer, the AMA is non-absolutist, because it would take into account the human agent’s own principles and values. We argue that the AMA would respect and indeed enhance individuals’ moral autonomy, help individuals achieve wide and a narrow reflective equilibrium, make up for the limitations of human moral psychology in a way that takes conservatives’ objections to human bioenhancement seriously, and implement the positive functions of intuitions and emotions in human morality without their downsides, such as biases and prejudices.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:10:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:519b5f2f-91af-4090-98aa-258d2dc967c0
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:10:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:519b5f2f-91af-4090-98aa-258d2dc967c02022-03-26T16:20:36ZThe artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligenceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:519b5f2f-91af-4090-98aa-258d2dc967c0Symplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Netherlands2017Giubilini, ASavulescu, JWe describe a form of moral artificial intelligence that could be used to improve human moral decision-making. We call it the “artificial moral advisor” (AMA). The AMA would implement a quasi-relativistic version of the “ideal observer” famously described by Roderick Firth. We describe similarities and differences between the AMA and Firth’s ideal observer. Like Firth’s ideal observer, the AMA is disinterested, dispassionate, and consistent in its judgments. Unlike Firth’s observer, the AMA is non-absolutist, because it would take into account the human agent’s own principles and values. We argue that the AMA would respect and indeed enhance individuals’ moral autonomy, help individuals achieve wide and a narrow reflective equilibrium, make up for the limitations of human moral psychology in a way that takes conservatives’ objections to human bioenhancement seriously, and implement the positive functions of intuitions and emotions in human morality without their downsides, such as biases and prejudices.
spellingShingle Giubilini, A
Savulescu, J
The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title_full The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title_fullStr The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title_full_unstemmed The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title_short The artificial moral advisor: the "ideal observer" meets artificial intelligence
title_sort artificial moral advisor the ideal observer meets artificial intelligence
work_keys_str_mv AT giubilinia theartificialmoraladvisortheidealobservermeetsartificialintelligence
AT savulescuj theartificialmoraladvisortheidealobservermeetsartificialintelligence
AT giubilinia artificialmoraladvisortheidealobservermeetsartificialintelligence
AT savulescuj artificialmoraladvisortheidealobservermeetsartificialintelligence