Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy

Lawson and McCauley (1990) have argued that non-cultured regularities in how actions are conceptualized inform and constrain participants' understandings of religious rituals. This theory of ritual competence generates three predictions: 1) People with little or no knowledge of any given ritual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barrett, J, Lawson, E
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Brill 2001
Subjects:
_version_ 1826272317075881984
author Barrett, J
Lawson, E
author_facet Barrett, J
Lawson, E
author_sort Barrett, J
collection OXFORD
description Lawson and McCauley (1990) have argued that non-cultured regularities in how actions are conceptualized inform and constrain participants' understandings of religious rituals. This theory of ritual competence generates three predictions: 1) People with little or no knowledge of any given ritual system will have intuitions about the potential effectiveness of a ritual given minimal information about the structure of the ritual. 2) The representation of superhuman agency in the action structure will be considered the most important factor contributing to effectiveness. 3) Having an appropriate intentional agent initiate the action will be considered relatively more important than any specific action to be performed. These three predictions were tested in two experiments with 128 North American Protestant college students who rated the probability of various fictitious rituals to be effective in bringing about a specified consequence. Results support Lawson and McCauley's predictions and suggest that expectations regarding ordinary social actions apply to religious rituals.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:10:39Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:51ad97ab-3572-450b-96a2-727aa84df8d7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:10:39Z
publishDate 2001
publisher Brill
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:51ad97ab-3572-450b-96a2-727aa84df8d72022-03-26T16:21:02ZRitual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:51ad97ab-3572-450b-96a2-727aa84df8d7AnthropologyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetBrill2001Barrett, JLawson, ELawson and McCauley (1990) have argued that non-cultured regularities in how actions are conceptualized inform and constrain participants' understandings of religious rituals. This theory of ritual competence generates three predictions: 1) People with little or no knowledge of any given ritual system will have intuitions about the potential effectiveness of a ritual given minimal information about the structure of the ritual. 2) The representation of superhuman agency in the action structure will be considered the most important factor contributing to effectiveness. 3) Having an appropriate intentional agent initiate the action will be considered relatively more important than any specific action to be performed. These three predictions were tested in two experiments with 128 North American Protestant college students who rated the probability of various fictitious rituals to be effective in bringing about a specified consequence. Results support Lawson and McCauley's predictions and suggest that expectations regarding ordinary social actions apply to religious rituals.
spellingShingle Anthropology
Barrett, J
Lawson, E
Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title_full Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title_fullStr Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title_short Ritual intuitions: cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
title_sort ritual intuitions cognitive contributions to judgements of ritual efficacy
topic Anthropology
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettj ritualintuitionscognitivecontributionstojudgementsofritualefficacy
AT lawsone ritualintuitionscognitivecontributionstojudgementsofritualefficacy