The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740

<p>This thesis examines the seating arrangements of English parish churches between 1500 and 1740 in order to define their basis, the reflection of society through them and areas of tension made apparent in pew disputes.</p> <p>It begins by charting the development of the ecclesias...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dillow, KB
Other Authors: Heal, F
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 1990
Subjects:
_version_ 1817933155784458240
author Dillow, KB
author2 Heal, F
author_facet Heal, F
Dillow, KB
author_sort Dillow, KB
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis examines the seating arrangements of English parish churches between 1500 and 1740 in order to define their basis, the reflection of society through them and areas of tension made apparent in pew disputes.</p> <p>It begins by charting the development of the ecclesiastical law in the early seventeenth century. Unusually this is seen to have been based upon cases prohibited to the common law on the basis of prescription. Chapter Three then examines the procedure of the ecclesiastical courts and shows that the scope of their interest was far wider than legal theory implies. The courts are shown to have been most concerned with the physical appearance of seats and their convenient placement. This was never organised into a coordinated campaign until the 1630’s, but even the Laudians failed to end the ingrained abuses of the pew system because of the passive resistance of the parish authorities.</p> <p>Pew disputes and the deciding of titles to seats was a significant part of the ecclesiastical courts’ business. The motivation these cases differed under the office and instance procedure. The former type of case was concerned only with the punishment of disruption or disobedience; the latter with the actual question of title.</p> <p>The assigning of seats is shown to have been undertaken mainly by the churchwardens, either through the formation of a composite picture of an individual or on the basis of a life-payment or rent. Both systems are examined and their workings and differences analysed. Chapter Five examines the correlation between the church’s seating arrangements and society as a whole and shows this to have been good but not perfect. In the final chapter, the reasoning behind pew disputes is analysed. This reveals pew disputes as essentially the preserve of the gentry of market towns and as a form of honour conflict.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:04:58Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:521f6705-576e-4220-a691-74812bbe16c3
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:49:19Z
publishDate 1990
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:521f6705-576e-4220-a691-74812bbe16c32024-12-08T12:34:02ZThe social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740Thesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:521f6705-576e-4220-a691-74812bbe16c3Religion and social status -- Great Britain -- HistoryPews and pew rightsEnglishHyrax Deposit1990Dillow, KBHeal, F<p>This thesis examines the seating arrangements of English parish churches between 1500 and 1740 in order to define their basis, the reflection of society through them and areas of tension made apparent in pew disputes.</p> <p>It begins by charting the development of the ecclesiastical law in the early seventeenth century. Unusually this is seen to have been based upon cases prohibited to the common law on the basis of prescription. Chapter Three then examines the procedure of the ecclesiastical courts and shows that the scope of their interest was far wider than legal theory implies. The courts are shown to have been most concerned with the physical appearance of seats and their convenient placement. This was never organised into a coordinated campaign until the 1630’s, but even the Laudians failed to end the ingrained abuses of the pew system because of the passive resistance of the parish authorities.</p> <p>Pew disputes and the deciding of titles to seats was a significant part of the ecclesiastical courts’ business. The motivation these cases differed under the office and instance procedure. The former type of case was concerned only with the punishment of disruption or disobedience; the latter with the actual question of title.</p> <p>The assigning of seats is shown to have been undertaken mainly by the churchwardens, either through the formation of a composite picture of an individual or on the basis of a life-payment or rent. Both systems are examined and their workings and differences analysed. Chapter Five examines the correlation between the church’s seating arrangements and society as a whole and shows this to have been good but not perfect. In the final chapter, the reasoning behind pew disputes is analysed. This reveals pew disputes as essentially the preserve of the gentry of market towns and as a form of honour conflict.</p>
spellingShingle Religion and social status -- Great Britain -- History
Pews and pew rights
Dillow, KB
The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title_full The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title_fullStr The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title_full_unstemmed The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title_short The social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes, 1500-1740
title_sort social and ecclesiastical significance of church seating arrangements and pew disputes 1500 1740
topic Religion and social status -- Great Britain -- History
Pews and pew rights
work_keys_str_mv AT dillowkb thesocialandecclesiasticalsignificanceofchurchseatingarrangementsandpewdisputes15001740
AT dillowkb socialandecclesiasticalsignificanceofchurchseatingarrangementsandpewdisputes15001740