Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study
Simulated multi-model "diversity" in aerosol direct radiative forcing estimates is often perceived as a measure of aerosol uncertainty. However, current models used for aerosol radiative forcing calculations vary considerably in model components relevant for forcing calculations and the as...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| _version_ | 1797068666343260160 |
|---|---|
| author | Stier, P Schutgens, N Bian, H Boucher, O Chin, M Ghan, S Huneeus, N Kinne, S Lin, G Myhre, G Penner, J Randles, C Samset, B Schulz, M Yu, H Zhou, C |
| author_facet | Stier, P Schutgens, N Bian, H Boucher, O Chin, M Ghan, S Huneeus, N Kinne, S Lin, G Myhre, G Penner, J Randles, C Samset, B Schulz, M Yu, H Zhou, C |
| author_sort | Stier, P |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Simulated multi-model "diversity" in aerosol direct radiative forcing estimates is often perceived as a measure of aerosol uncertainty. However, current models used for aerosol radiative forcing calculations vary considerably in model components relevant for forcing calculations and the associated "host-model uncertainties" are generally convoluted with the actual aerosol uncertainty. In this AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study we systematically isolate and quantify host model uncertainties on aerosol forcing experiments through prescription of identical aerosol radiative properties in twelve participating models. Even with prescribed aerosol radiative properties, simulated clear-sky and all-sky aerosol radiative forcings show significant diversity. For a purely scattering case with globally constant optical depth of 0.2, the global-mean all-sky top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing is -4.47 Wm-2 and the inter-model standard deviation is 0.55 Wm-2, corresponding to a relative standard deviation of 12 %. For a case with partially absorbing aerosol with an aerosol optical depth of 0.2 and single scattering albedo of 0.8, the forcing changes to 1.04 Wm-2, and the standard deviation increases to 1.01 W-2, corresponding to a significant relative standard deviation of 97 %. However, the top-of-atmosphere forcing variability owing to absorption (subtracting the scattering case from the case with scattering and absorption) is low, with absolute (relative) standard deviations of 0.45 Wm-2 (8 %) clear-sky and 0.62 Wm -2 (11 %) all-sky. Scaling the forcing standard deviation for a purely scattering case to match the sulfate radiative forcing in the AeroCom Direct Effect experiment demonstrates that host model uncertainties could explain about 36 % of the overall sulfate forcing diversity of 0.11 Wm -2 in the AeroCom Direct Radiative Effect experiment. Host model errors in aerosol radiative forcing are largest in regions of uncertain host model components, such as stratocumulus cloud decks or areas with poorly constrained surface albedos, such as sea ice. Our results demonstrate that host model uncertainties are an important component of aerosol forcing uncertainty that require further attention. © Author(s) 2013. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:13:27Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:529a7f84-fc5b-44a2-9037-224cb5ff2210 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:13:27Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:529a7f84-fc5b-44a2-9037-224cb5ff22102022-03-26T16:26:31ZHost model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison studyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:529a7f84-fc5b-44a2-9037-224cb5ff2210EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2013Stier, PSchutgens, NBian, HBoucher, OChin, MGhan, SHuneeus, NKinne, SLin, GMyhre, GPenner, JRandles, CSamset, BSchulz, MYu, HZhou, CSimulated multi-model "diversity" in aerosol direct radiative forcing estimates is often perceived as a measure of aerosol uncertainty. However, current models used for aerosol radiative forcing calculations vary considerably in model components relevant for forcing calculations and the associated "host-model uncertainties" are generally convoluted with the actual aerosol uncertainty. In this AeroCom Prescribed intercomparison study we systematically isolate and quantify host model uncertainties on aerosol forcing experiments through prescription of identical aerosol radiative properties in twelve participating models. Even with prescribed aerosol radiative properties, simulated clear-sky and all-sky aerosol radiative forcings show significant diversity. For a purely scattering case with globally constant optical depth of 0.2, the global-mean all-sky top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing is -4.47 Wm-2 and the inter-model standard deviation is 0.55 Wm-2, corresponding to a relative standard deviation of 12 %. For a case with partially absorbing aerosol with an aerosol optical depth of 0.2 and single scattering albedo of 0.8, the forcing changes to 1.04 Wm-2, and the standard deviation increases to 1.01 W-2, corresponding to a significant relative standard deviation of 97 %. However, the top-of-atmosphere forcing variability owing to absorption (subtracting the scattering case from the case with scattering and absorption) is low, with absolute (relative) standard deviations of 0.45 Wm-2 (8 %) clear-sky and 0.62 Wm -2 (11 %) all-sky. Scaling the forcing standard deviation for a purely scattering case to match the sulfate radiative forcing in the AeroCom Direct Effect experiment demonstrates that host model uncertainties could explain about 36 % of the overall sulfate forcing diversity of 0.11 Wm -2 in the AeroCom Direct Radiative Effect experiment. Host model errors in aerosol radiative forcing are largest in regions of uncertain host model components, such as stratocumulus cloud decks or areas with poorly constrained surface albedos, such as sea ice. Our results demonstrate that host model uncertainties are an important component of aerosol forcing uncertainty that require further attention. © Author(s) 2013. |
| spellingShingle | Stier, P Schutgens, N Bian, H Boucher, O Chin, M Ghan, S Huneeus, N Kinne, S Lin, G Myhre, G Penner, J Randles, C Samset, B Schulz, M Yu, H Zhou, C Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title | Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title_full | Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title_fullStr | Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title_short | Host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates: results from the AeroCom prescribed intercomparison study |
| title_sort | host model uncertainties in aerosol radiative forcing estimates results from the aerocom prescribed intercomparison study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stierp hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT schutgensn hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT bianh hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT bouchero hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT chinm hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT ghans hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT huneeusn hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT kinnes hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT ling hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT myhreg hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT pennerj hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT randlesc hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT samsetb hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT schulzm hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT yuh hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy AT zhouc hostmodeluncertaintiesinaerosolradiativeforcingestimatesresultsfromtheaerocomprescribedintercomparisonstudy |