Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?

UNLABELLED: Introduction. This study explores the geographical variation in renal replacement therapy (RRT) incidence and prevalence after adjusting for general population socio-demographics, renal unit treatment patterns and travel times. METHODS: The UK Renal Registry provided data on all patients...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Judge, A, Caskey, F, Welton, N, Ansell, D, Tomson, C, Roderick, P, Ben-Shlomo, Y
स्वरूप: Journal article
भाषा:English
प्रकाशित: 2012
_version_ 1826272512097386496
author Judge, A
Caskey, F
Welton, N
Ansell, D
Tomson, C
Roderick, P
Ben-Shlomo, Y
author_facet Judge, A
Caskey, F
Welton, N
Ansell, D
Tomson, C
Roderick, P
Ben-Shlomo, Y
author_sort Judge, A
collection OXFORD
description UNLABELLED: Introduction. This study explores the geographical variation in renal replacement therapy (RRT) incidence and prevalence after adjusting for general population socio-demographics, renal unit treatment patterns and travel times. METHODS: The UK Renal Registry provided data on all patients in England commencing RRT in 2007 and receiving RRT on 31 December 2007. Multilevel Poisson regression models were constructed separately for incidence and prevalence. Geographical Information Systems software enabled estimation of road travel times and renal unit catchment areas. Small area estimates of RRT prevalence were produced for all 354 local authority districts. RESULTS: Adjusted RRT incidence rates were 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6) times higher in the most deprived areas and 1.7 (1.5-2.0) and 1.5 (1.3-1.7) times higher in areas with most Black and South Asian inhabitants (10+%), respectively. The proportion of a centre's patients on haemodialysis or transplanted were positively associated with RRT incidence (not prevalence); numbers of satellite units were negatively associated with RRT incidence (not prevalence). While only 3% of patients lived >30 min from a dialysis unit, there was an effect of travel time on RRT rates; individuals living 45+ min from a dialysis unit were 20% less likely to commence or receive RRT than those living within 15 min (Ptrend=0.36 and Ptrend<0.001, respectively). A 4-fold variation in adjusted local authority district RRT prevalence rates could not be explained. CONCLUSION: Expansion of renal unit facilities in England has reduced travel times in most areas though the possibility of inequitable geographic access to RRT persists.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:13:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:52b26b9a-48c4-4b85-ac5a-b92f005c00d8
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:13:43Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:52b26b9a-48c4-4b85-ac5a-b92f005c00d82022-03-26T16:27:01ZInequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:52b26b9a-48c4-4b85-ac5a-b92f005c00d8EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Judge, ACaskey, FWelton, NAnsell, DTomson, CRoderick, PBen-Shlomo, YUNLABELLED: Introduction. This study explores the geographical variation in renal replacement therapy (RRT) incidence and prevalence after adjusting for general population socio-demographics, renal unit treatment patterns and travel times. METHODS: The UK Renal Registry provided data on all patients in England commencing RRT in 2007 and receiving RRT on 31 December 2007. Multilevel Poisson regression models were constructed separately for incidence and prevalence. Geographical Information Systems software enabled estimation of road travel times and renal unit catchment areas. Small area estimates of RRT prevalence were produced for all 354 local authority districts. RESULTS: Adjusted RRT incidence rates were 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6) times higher in the most deprived areas and 1.7 (1.5-2.0) and 1.5 (1.3-1.7) times higher in areas with most Black and South Asian inhabitants (10+%), respectively. The proportion of a centre's patients on haemodialysis or transplanted were positively associated with RRT incidence (not prevalence); numbers of satellite units were negatively associated with RRT incidence (not prevalence). While only 3% of patients lived >30 min from a dialysis unit, there was an effect of travel time on RRT rates; individuals living 45+ min from a dialysis unit were 20% less likely to commence or receive RRT than those living within 15 min (Ptrend=0.36 and Ptrend<0.001, respectively). A 4-fold variation in adjusted local authority district RRT prevalence rates could not be explained. CONCLUSION: Expansion of renal unit facilities in England has reduced travel times in most areas though the possibility of inequitable geographic access to RRT persists.
spellingShingle Judge, A
Caskey, F
Welton, N
Ansell, D
Tomson, C
Roderick, P
Ben-Shlomo, Y
Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title_full Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title_fullStr Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title_full_unstemmed Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title_short Inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in England: does it matter who you are or where you live?
title_sort inequalities in rates of renal replacement therapy in england does it matter who you are or where you live
work_keys_str_mv AT judgea inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT caskeyf inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT weltonn inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT anselld inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT tomsonc inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT roderickp inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive
AT benshlomoy inequalitiesinratesofrenalreplacementtherapyinenglanddoesitmatterwhoyouareorwhereyoulive