Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.

Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.

Across three experiments, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to vibrotactile targets presented to the thumb (held in a lower position) or the index finger (upper position) of either hand, while simultaneously trying to ignore visual distractors presented independently from...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Spence, C, Pavani, F, Driver, J
Format:	Journal article
Jezik:	English
Izdano:	2004

Podobne knjige/članki

Tactile Change Blindness Induced by Tactile and Visual Distractors
od: Malika Auvray, et al.
Izdano: (2011-10-01)

Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.
od: Auvray, M, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.
od: Sanabria, D, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.
od: Soto-Faraco, S, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.
od: Gallace, A, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Visual capture of touch (tactile ventriloquism); Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.
od: Pavani, F, et al.
Izdano: (1999)

Cross-modal congruency and visual capture in a visual elevation-discrimination task.
od: Walton, M, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Temporal Electroencephalography Traits Dissociating Tactile Information and Cross-Modal Congruence Effects
od: Yusuke Ozawa, et al.
Izdano: (2023-12-01)

You can't ignore what you can't separate: the effect of visually induced target-distractor separation on tactile selection.
od: Wesslein, A, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Cross-modal links in spatial attention.
od: Driver, J, et al.
Izdano: (1998)

Crossmodal influences on tactile perception: The role of attention in multimodal integration
od: Spence, C, et al.
Izdano: (2000)

When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
od: Wesslein, A, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.
od: Holmes, N, et al.
Izdano: (2006)

When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.
od: Frings, C, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities.
od: Soto-Faraco, S, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.
od: Wesslein, A, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context
od: Xiaoyu Tang, et al.
Izdano: (2024-12-01)

Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.
od: Kennett, S, et al.
Izdano: (2001)

Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention
od: Merz, S, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction.
od: Maravita, A, et al.
Izdano: (2001)

Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.
od: Spence, C, et al.
Izdano: (2000)

Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.
od: Koppen, C, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Directing visual attention with spatially informative and spatially noninformative tactile cues.
od: Jones, C, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture.
od: Kennett, S, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Crossmodal Congruency Enhances Performance of Healthy Older Adults in Visual-Tactile Pattern Matching
od: Focko L. Higgen, et al.
Izdano: (2020-03-01)

Visually guided saccades and acoustic distractors: no evidence for the remote distractor effect or global effect
od: Tari, B, et al.
Izdano: (2020)

Upper Visual Field Advantage in Localizing a Target among Distractors
od: Jing Feng, et al.
Izdano: (2014-04-01)

Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.
od: Pavani, F, et al.
Izdano: (2000)

Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.
od: Spence, C, et al.
Izdano: (1998)

Research on visual‐tactile cross‐modality based on generative adversarial network
od: Yaoyao Li, et al.
Izdano: (2021-06-01)

Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.
od: Spence, C, et al.
Izdano: (2000)

Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
od: Igarashi, Y, et al.
Izdano: (2007)

Distinct neural substrates for visual search amongst spatial versus temporal distractors.
od: Coull, J, et al.
Izdano: (2003)

A Cross-Modal Tactile Reproduction Utilizing Tactile and Visual Information Generated by Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks
od: Koki Hatori, et al.
Izdano: (2025-01-01)

Reflexive spatial orienting of tactile attention.
od: Spence, C, et al.
Izdano: (2001)

The contradictory influence of velocity: representational momentum in the tactile modality
od: Merz, S, et al.
Izdano: (2019)

SPATIAL SYNERGIES BETWEEN AUDITORY AND VISUAL-ATTENTION
od: Driver, J, et al.
Izdano: (1994)

Spatial synergies between auditory and visual attention
od: Driver, J, et al.
Izdano: (1994)

Modality-specific impacts of distractors on visual and auditory categorical decision-making: an evidence accumulation perspective
od: Jianhua Li, et al.
Izdano: (2024-05-01)

Textual and Visual Catalyzers/Distractors in Advertising
od: Walter Giordano
Izdano: (2022-12-01)