Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard.
The optimal division of resources into offspring size vs. number is one of the classic problems in life-history evolution. Importantly, models that take into account the discrete nature of resource division at low clutch sizes suggest that the variance in offspring size should decline with increasin...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2009
|
| _version_ | 1797068750562787328 |
|---|---|
| author | Uller, T While, G Wapstra, E Warner, D Goodman, B Schwarzkopf, L Langkilde, T Doughty, P Radder, R Rohr, D Bull, C Shine, R Olsson, M |
| author_facet | Uller, T While, G Wapstra, E Warner, D Goodman, B Schwarzkopf, L Langkilde, T Doughty, P Radder, R Rohr, D Bull, C Shine, R Olsson, M |
| author_sort | Uller, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The optimal division of resources into offspring size vs. number is one of the classic problems in life-history evolution. Importantly, models that take into account the discrete nature of resource division at low clutch sizes suggest that the variance in offspring size should decline with increasing clutch size according to an invariant relationship. We tested this prediction in 12 species of lizard with small clutch sizes. Contrary to expectations, not all species showed a negative relationship between variance in offspring size and clutch size, and the pattern significantly deviated from quantitative predictions in five of the 12 species. We suggest that the main limitation of current size-number models for small clutch sizes is that they rely on assumptions of hierarchical allocation strategies with independence between allocation decisions. Indeed, selection may favour alternative mechanisms of reproductive allocation that avoid suboptimal allocation imposed by the indivisible fraction at low clutch sizes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:14:37Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:52f97fd2-8bd1-4e00-88b6-736911f1699b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T22:14:37Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:52f97fd2-8bd1-4e00-88b6-736911f1699b2022-03-26T16:28:44ZEvaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:52f97fd2-8bd1-4e00-88b6-736911f1699bEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Uller, TWhile, GWapstra, EWarner, DGoodman, BSchwarzkopf, LLangkilde, TDoughty, PRadder, RRohr, DBull, CShine, ROlsson, MThe optimal division of resources into offspring size vs. number is one of the classic problems in life-history evolution. Importantly, models that take into account the discrete nature of resource division at low clutch sizes suggest that the variance in offspring size should decline with increasing clutch size according to an invariant relationship. We tested this prediction in 12 species of lizard with small clutch sizes. Contrary to expectations, not all species showed a negative relationship between variance in offspring size and clutch size, and the pattern significantly deviated from quantitative predictions in five of the 12 species. We suggest that the main limitation of current size-number models for small clutch sizes is that they rely on assumptions of hierarchical allocation strategies with independence between allocation decisions. Indeed, selection may favour alternative mechanisms of reproductive allocation that avoid suboptimal allocation imposed by the indivisible fraction at low clutch sizes. |
| spellingShingle | Uller, T While, G Wapstra, E Warner, D Goodman, B Schwarzkopf, L Langkilde, T Doughty, P Radder, R Rohr, D Bull, C Shine, R Olsson, M Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title | Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title_full | Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title_short | Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard. |
| title_sort | evaluation of offspring size number invariants in 12 species of lizard |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ullert evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT whileg evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT wapstrae evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT warnerd evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT goodmanb evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT schwarzkopfl evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT langkildet evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT doughtyp evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT radderr evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT rohrd evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT bullc evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT shiner evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard AT olssonm evaluationofoffspringsizenumberinvariantsin12speciesoflizard |