Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?

BACKGROUND: Seclusion continues to be widely used in the management of disturbed behaviour in hospitalized patients. While early research on the topic highlighted significant differences in staff and patient perceptions, there are few recent data to indicate if these differences still exist. AIM: T...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Meehan, T, Bergen, H, Fjeldsoe, K
Formato: Journal article
Idioma:English
Publicado em: 2004
_version_ 1826272575179718656
author Meehan, T
Bergen, H
Fjeldsoe, K
author_facet Meehan, T
Bergen, H
Fjeldsoe, K
author_sort Meehan, T
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Seclusion continues to be widely used in the management of disturbed behaviour in hospitalized patients. While early research on the topic highlighted significant differences in staff and patient perceptions, there are few recent data to indicate if these differences still exist. AIM: This paper reports a study exploring the perceptions of both nursing staff and patients towards the reasons for seclusion; its effects; patients' feelings during seclusion; and possible changes to the practice. METHODS: Sixty nursing staff and 29 patients who had experienced seclusion at three inpatient units in Queensland, Australia completed Heyman's Attitudes to Seclusion Survey. RESULTS: The findings indicate that the two groups differed significantly on a number of the dimensions assessed. Nurses believed seclusion to be very necessary, not very punitive and a highly therapeutic practice that assisted patients to calm down and feel better. Patients, on the other hand, believed that seclusion was used frequently for minor disturbances and as a means of staff exerting power and control. Patients also believed that seclusion resulted in them feeling punished, and had little therapeutic value. CONCLUSION: The disagreement between staff and patients highlights the need for greater dialogue between these groups. While nursing staff require greater understanding of how patients feel about seclusion, patients require information on why and how seclusion is implemented.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:14:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:52fff44c-138b-4505-a6d2-d73bb6d2ea7d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:14:43Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:52fff44c-138b-4505-a6d2-d73bb6d2ea7d2022-03-26T16:28:56ZStaff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:52fff44c-138b-4505-a6d2-d73bb6d2ea7dEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Meehan, TBergen, HFjeldsoe, K BACKGROUND: Seclusion continues to be widely used in the management of disturbed behaviour in hospitalized patients. While early research on the topic highlighted significant differences in staff and patient perceptions, there are few recent data to indicate if these differences still exist. AIM: This paper reports a study exploring the perceptions of both nursing staff and patients towards the reasons for seclusion; its effects; patients' feelings during seclusion; and possible changes to the practice. METHODS: Sixty nursing staff and 29 patients who had experienced seclusion at three inpatient units in Queensland, Australia completed Heyman's Attitudes to Seclusion Survey. RESULTS: The findings indicate that the two groups differed significantly on a number of the dimensions assessed. Nurses believed seclusion to be very necessary, not very punitive and a highly therapeutic practice that assisted patients to calm down and feel better. Patients, on the other hand, believed that seclusion was used frequently for minor disturbances and as a means of staff exerting power and control. Patients also believed that seclusion resulted in them feeling punished, and had little therapeutic value. CONCLUSION: The disagreement between staff and patients highlights the need for greater dialogue between these groups. While nursing staff require greater understanding of how patients feel about seclusion, patients require information on why and how seclusion is implemented.
spellingShingle Meehan, T
Bergen, H
Fjeldsoe, K
Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title_full Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title_fullStr Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title_full_unstemmed Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title_short Staff and patient perceptions of seclusion: has anything changed?
title_sort staff and patient perceptions of seclusion has anything changed
work_keys_str_mv AT meehant staffandpatientperceptionsofseclusionhasanythingchanged
AT bergenh staffandpatientperceptionsofseclusionhasanythingchanged
AT fjeldsoek staffandpatientperceptionsofseclusionhasanythingchanged