Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews

Health information technologies are complex interventions whose effects differ across contexts. To improve our understanding of the effects of health information technologies, approaches are needed that utilize evidence beyond experimental results in order to provide explanatory answers to how and w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Otte-Trojel, T, Wong, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: IOS Press 2016
_version_ 1797068805125439488
author Otte-Trojel, T
Wong, G
author_facet Otte-Trojel, T
Wong, G
author_sort Otte-Trojel, T
collection OXFORD
description Health information technologies are complex interventions whose effects differ across contexts. To improve our understanding of the effects of health information technologies, approaches are needed that utilize evidence beyond experimental results in order to provide explanatory answers to how and why a given technology works. The relatively new realist and meta-narrative review approaches are introduced as important methods in synthesising and analysing evidence in the field of health informatics. A common purpose of these two review approaches is to help create a sense of evidence about complex interventions that enables an understanding of how and why they work. A detailed description of the principles and objectives of the two types of reviews is presented. Key steps required to conduct each of the reviews are summarized, and examples of how the review approaches have been applied to topics related to health informatics are provided. Limitations of the two review approaches are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:15:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:533afec2-7fde-4eb5-ac18-e163a0db9bf1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:15:24Z
publishDate 2016
publisher IOS Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:533afec2-7fde-4eb5-ac18-e163a0db9bf12022-03-26T16:30:13ZGoing beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviewsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:533afec2-7fde-4eb5-ac18-e163a0db9bf1EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordIOS Press2016Otte-Trojel, TWong, GHealth information technologies are complex interventions whose effects differ across contexts. To improve our understanding of the effects of health information technologies, approaches are needed that utilize evidence beyond experimental results in order to provide explanatory answers to how and why a given technology works. The relatively new realist and meta-narrative review approaches are introduced as important methods in synthesising and analysing evidence in the field of health informatics. A common purpose of these two review approaches is to help create a sense of evidence about complex interventions that enables an understanding of how and why they work. A detailed description of the principles and objectives of the two types of reviews is presented. Key steps required to conduct each of the reviews are summarized, and examples of how the review approaches have been applied to topics related to health informatics are provided. Limitations of the two review approaches are discussed.
spellingShingle Otte-Trojel, T
Wong, G
Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title_full Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title_fullStr Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title_full_unstemmed Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title_short Going beyond systematic reviews: realist and meta-narrative reviews
title_sort going beyond systematic reviews realist and meta narrative reviews
work_keys_str_mv AT ottetrojelt goingbeyondsystematicreviewsrealistandmetanarrativereviews
AT wongg goingbeyondsystematicreviewsrealistandmetanarrativereviews