Essays on epistemic structure

<p>This thesis is made up of five chapters: one integrative chapter, and four discrete essays. Each of the four essays is concerned with some aspect of epistemic structure. The first essay, <em>Risk</em>, <em>Doubt and Transmission</em>, explores structural analogies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fraser, R
Other Authors: Fricker, E
Format: Thesis
Published: 2016
_version_ 1826316712903966720
author Fraser, R
author2 Fricker, E
author_facet Fricker, E
Fraser, R
author_sort Fraser, R
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis is made up of five chapters: one integrative chapter, and four discrete essays. Each of the four essays is concerned with some aspect of epistemic structure. The first essay, <em>Risk</em>, <em>Doubt and Transmission</em>, explores structural analogies between testimonial transmission and closure principles. The second, Testimonial Pessimism, traces the connections between moral and aesthetic testimony’s putative shortcomings and the philosophy of language. The third essay, <em>Epistemic Ambivalence</em>, argues that the ideology of higher-order defeat is paradox prone, and as such, ought to be rejected. The fourth essay, <em>Tragedy and Rationality</em>, makes vivid some costs associated with endorsing an anti-akratic constraint on rationality.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:18:36Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:54421ae9-7896-4f8e-b203-82542e6c1c83
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:49:57Z
publishDate 2016
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:54421ae9-7896-4f8e-b203-82542e6c1c832024-12-08T13:14:09ZEssays on epistemic structureThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:54421ae9-7896-4f8e-b203-82542e6c1c83ORA Deposit2016Fraser, RFricker, EHawthorne, J<p>This thesis is made up of five chapters: one integrative chapter, and four discrete essays. Each of the four essays is concerned with some aspect of epistemic structure. The first essay, <em>Risk</em>, <em>Doubt and Transmission</em>, explores structural analogies between testimonial transmission and closure principles. The second, Testimonial Pessimism, traces the connections between moral and aesthetic testimony’s putative shortcomings and the philosophy of language. The third essay, <em>Epistemic Ambivalence</em>, argues that the ideology of higher-order defeat is paradox prone, and as such, ought to be rejected. The fourth essay, <em>Tragedy and Rationality</em>, makes vivid some costs associated with endorsing an anti-akratic constraint on rationality.</p>
spellingShingle Fraser, R
Essays on epistemic structure
title Essays on epistemic structure
title_full Essays on epistemic structure
title_fullStr Essays on epistemic structure
title_full_unstemmed Essays on epistemic structure
title_short Essays on epistemic structure
title_sort essays on epistemic structure
work_keys_str_mv AT fraserr essaysonepistemicstructure