Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study

Бібліографічні деталі
Автори:	Hopewell, S, Boutron, I, Altman, D, Ravaud, P
Формат:	Journal article
Мова:	English
Опубліковано:	BMJ Publishing Group 2013

Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2015)

Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials.
за авторством: Bruno Giraudeau, та інші
Опубліковано: (2009-05-01)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
за авторством: Yavchitz, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2014)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
за авторством: Chauvin, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2017)

Characteristics of non-randomised studies of drug treatments: cross sectional study
за авторством: Raphaël Porcher, та інші
Опубліковано: (2024-08-01)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010)

ASSESSING RISK OF BIAS IN RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS INCLUDED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: THE WHY IS EASY, THE HOW IS A CHALLENGE
за авторством: Hrobjartsson, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2013)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
за авторством: Matthias Briel, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020-03-01)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
за авторством: Mathieu, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2009)

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2014)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
за авторством: Speich, B, та інші
Опубліковано: (2020)

The VEPRO trial: A cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
за авторством: Boutron Isabelle, та інші
Опубліковано: (2008-09-01)

Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results Reply
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010)

Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
за авторством: Lazarus, C, та інші
Опубліковано: (2016)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
за авторством: Higgins, J, та інші
Опубліковано: (2011)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
за авторством: Higgins, J, та інші
Опубліковано: (2011)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review.
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2013)

Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2016)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
за авторством: Kirkham, J, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010)

Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals : retrospective before and after study
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2014)

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
за авторством: Van Thu Nguyen, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021-11-01)

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
за авторством: Dechartres, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2017)

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
за авторством: Sterne, JAC, та інші
Опубліковано: (2019)

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010)

Risk of bias in published randomised controlled trials
за авторством: Indubala Maurya, та інші
Опубліковано: (2023-01-01)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News.
за авторством: Romana Haneef, та інші
Опубліковано: (2015-01-01)

Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age
за авторством: Page, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018)

Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
за авторством: Sally Hopewell, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018-01-01)

Underrepresentation of elderly people in randomised controlled trials. The example of trials of 4 widely prescribed drugs.
за авторством: Cécile Konrat, та інші
Опубліковано: (2012-01-01)

Assessment of transparency and selective reporting of interventional trials studying colorectal cancer
за авторством: Anna Pellat, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022-03-01)

The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment; explanation and elaboration
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2008)

Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2012)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
за авторством: Hopewell, S, та інші
Опубліковано: (2012)

Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
за авторством: Nagendran, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2013)

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments.
за авторством: Boutron, I, та інші
Опубліковано: (2008)

Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
за авторством: Dechartres, A, та інші
Опубліковано: (2011)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study

Схожі ресурси

Схожі ресурси