Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"

The effectiveness of a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption" (SAFD) is assessed in a vessel of 0.72 m diameter and an aspect ratio of 2: 1. Measurement of power drawn by the impeller achieving SAFD and of the three-dimensional flow field close to the dispersion surface are b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boon, L, Hoeks, F, van der Lans, R, Bujalski, W, Wolff, M, Nienow, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2002
_version_ 1826272975679127552
author Boon, L
Hoeks, F
van der Lans, R
Bujalski, W
Wolff, M
Nienow, A
author_facet Boon, L
Hoeks, F
van der Lans, R
Bujalski, W
Wolff, M
Nienow, A
author_sort Boon, L
collection OXFORD
description The effectiveness of a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption" (SAFD) is assessed in a vessel of 0.72 m diameter and an aspect ratio of 2: 1. Measurement of power drawn by the impeller achieving SAFD and of the three-dimensional flow field close to the dispersion surface are both used to explain the findings along with the global gas hold-up. A large radial flow Rushton turbine can disrupt foam at a great height but requires high power. Down-pumping hydrofoils are only effective when the ungassed liquid height is below the level of the impeller employed to disrupt foam. Up-pumping hydrofoils are the most effective because their flow pattern gives rise to high velocities across the dispersion surface, which are able to entrain foam in the downflow generated at the walls. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:21:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:5511edad-9117-4344-ae61-ca826c5d4fd5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:21:04Z
publishDate 2002
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:5511edad-9117-4344-ae61-ca826c5d4fd52022-03-26T16:41:43ZComparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:5511edad-9117-4344-ae61-ca826c5d4fd5EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2002Boon, LHoeks, Fvan der Lans, RBujalski, WWolff, MNienow, AThe effectiveness of a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption" (SAFD) is assessed in a vessel of 0.72 m diameter and an aspect ratio of 2: 1. Measurement of power drawn by the impeller achieving SAFD and of the three-dimensional flow field close to the dispersion surface are both used to explain the findings along with the global gas hold-up. A large radial flow Rushton turbine can disrupt foam at a great height but requires high power. Down-pumping hydrofoils are only effective when the ungassed liquid height is below the level of the impeller employed to disrupt foam. Up-pumping hydrofoils are the most effective because their flow pattern gives rise to high velocities across the dispersion surface, which are able to entrain foam in the downflow generated at the walls. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Boon, L
Hoeks, F
van der Lans, R
Bujalski, W
Wolff, M
Nienow, A
Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title_full Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title_fullStr Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title_full_unstemmed Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title_short Comparing a range of impellers for "stirring as foam disruption"
title_sort comparing a range of impellers for stirring as foam disruption
work_keys_str_mv AT boonl comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption
AT hoeksf comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption
AT vanderlansr comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption
AT bujalskiw comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption
AT wolffm comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption
AT nienowa comparingarangeofimpellersforstirringasfoamdisruption