A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions

We use lattice techniques to calculate the continuum string tensions of SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions. We attempt to control all systematic errors at a level that allows us to perform a precise test of the analytic prediction of Karabali, Kim and Nair. We find that their prediction is withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bringoltz, B, Teper, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
_version_ 1797069246477369344
author Bringoltz, B
Teper, M
author_facet Bringoltz, B
Teper, M
author_sort Bringoltz, B
collection OXFORD
description We use lattice techniques to calculate the continuum string tensions of SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions. We attempt to control all systematic errors at a level that allows us to perform a precise test of the analytic prediction of Karabali, Kim and Nair. We find that their prediction is within 3% of our values for all N and that the discrepancy decreases with increasing N. When we extrapolate our results to N=oo we find that there remains a discrepancy of ~ 1%, which is a convincing ~6 sigma effect. Thus, while the Karabali-Nair analysis is remarkably accurate at N=oo, it is not exact.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T22:21:38Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:553f61e1-b653-4e1e-8c68-af3181b55d00
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T22:21:38Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:553f61e1-b653-4e1e-8c68-af3181b55d002022-03-26T16:42:49ZA precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:553f61e1-b653-4e1e-8c68-af3181b55d00EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Bringoltz, BTeper, MWe use lattice techniques to calculate the continuum string tensions of SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions. We attempt to control all systematic errors at a level that allows us to perform a precise test of the analytic prediction of Karabali, Kim and Nair. We find that their prediction is within 3% of our values for all N and that the discrepancy decreases with increasing N. When we extrapolate our results to N=oo we find that there remains a discrepancy of ~ 1%, which is a convincing ~6 sigma effect. Thus, while the Karabali-Nair analysis is remarkably accurate at N=oo, it is not exact.
spellingShingle Bringoltz, B
Teper, M
A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title_full A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title_fullStr A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title_full_unstemmed A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title_short A precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions
title_sort precise calculation of the fundamental string tension in su n gauge theories in 2 1 dimensions
work_keys_str_mv AT bringoltzb aprecisecalculationofthefundamentalstringtensioninsungaugetheoriesin21dimensions
AT teperm aprecisecalculationofthefundamentalstringtensioninsungaugetheoriesin21dimensions
AT bringoltzb precisecalculationofthefundamentalstringtensioninsungaugetheoriesin21dimensions
AT teperm precisecalculationofthefundamentalstringtensioninsungaugetheoriesin21dimensions